» Articles » PMID: 31044345

Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared with Gastric Bypass for Morbidly Obese Patients with End Stage Renal Disease: a Decision Analysis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 May 3
PMID 31044345
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The use of bariatric surgery has increased for morbidly obese patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) for whom listing on the waitlist is often restricted until a certain BMI threshold is achieved. Effective weight loss for this population improves access to life-saving renal transplantation. However, it is unclear whether sleeve gastrectomy (SG) vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a more effective therapy for these patients.

Methods: A decision analytic Markov state transition model was created to simulate the life of morbidly obese patients with ESRD who were deemed ineligible to be waitlisted for renal transplantation unless they achieved a BMI less than 35 kg/m. Life expectancy following weight management (MWM), RYGB, and SG were estimated. Base case patients were defined as having a pre-intervention BMI of 45 kg/m. Sensitivity analysis of initial BMI was performed. Markov parameters were extracted from literature review.

Results: RYGB improved survival compared with SG and MWM. RYGB patients had higher rates of transplantation, leading to improved mean long-term survival. Base case patients who underwent RYGB gained 1.3 additional years of life compared with patient's who underwent SG and 2.6 additional years of life compared with MWM.

Conclusions: RYGB improves access to renal transplantation and thereby increases long-term survival compared with SG and MWM. The use of SG may be incongruent with the goal of improving access to renal transplantation for morbidly obese patients.

Citing Articles

Sleeve Gastrectomy Reduces the Need for Liver Transplantation in Patients with Obesity and Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Predictive Model.

Rouhi A, Castle R, Hoeltzel G, Williams N, Dumon K, Baimas-George M Obes Surg. 2024; 34(4):1224-1231.

PMID: 38379059 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07102-x.


Ventricular Remodeling Following Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Decreases Need for Heart Transplantation: A Predictive Model.

Rouhi A, Choudhury R, Hoeltzel G, Ghanem Y, Bababekov Y, Suarez-Pierre A Obes Surg. 2023; 34(1):15-21.

PMID: 38017330 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06948-x.


The Impact and Effectiveness of Weight Loss on Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Sarno G, Frias-Toral E, Ceriani F, Montalvan M, Quintero B, Suarez R Nutrients. 2023; 15(11).

PMID: 37299471 PMC: 10255583. DOI: 10.3390/nu15112508.


Renal Function Following Bariatric Surgery: a Literature Review of Potential Mechanisms.

Li Z, Chen Y, Xiong J, Lyu Q, Jiang B Obes Surg. 2022; 32(5):1734-1740.

PMID: 35243602 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-05985-2.


Management of obesity in kidney transplant candidates and recipients: A clinical practice guideline by the DESCARTES Working Group of ERA.

Oniscu G, Abramowicz D, Bolignano D, Gandolfini I, Hellemans R, Maggiore U Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021; 37(Suppl 1):i1-i15.

PMID: 34788854 PMC: 8712154. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfab310.


References
1.
Fockens M, Alberts V, Bemelman F, van der Pant K, Idu M . Wound morbidity after kidney transplant. Prog Transplant. 2015; 25(1):45-8. DOI: 10.7182/pit2015812. View

2.
Mozer A, Pender 4th J, Chapman W, Sippey M, Pories W, Spaniolas K . Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Dialysis-Dependent Renal Failure. Obes Surg. 2015; 25(11):2088-92. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1656-0. View

3.
Wissing K, Pipeleers L . Obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation: prevention and treatment. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2014; 28(2):37-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2013.12.004. View

4.
Choudhury R, Murayama K, Neylan C, Savulionyte G, Glick H, Williams N . Re-examining the BMI threshold for bariatric surgery in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 18(12):2074-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2653-7. View

5.
Naugler W, Sonnenberg A . Survival and cost-effectiveness analysis of competing strategies in the management of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2010; 16(10):1186-94. DOI: 10.1002/lt.22129. View