EHealth Adoption and Use Among Healthcare Professionals in a Tertiary Hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Qmethodology Study

Overview

Journal PeerJ

Specialties Biology
Environmental Health
General Medicine

Date 2019 May 2

PMID 31041146

Citations 7

Authors

Muhammad Awwal Ladan

Heather Wharrad

Richard Windle

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to explore the viewpoints of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the adoption and use of eHealth in clinical practice in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Information and communication technologies (ICTs) including eHealth provide HCPs the opportunity to provide quality healthcare to their patients while also improving their own clinical practices. Despite this, previous research has identified these technologies have their associated challenges when adopting them for clinical practice. But more research is needed to identify how these eHealth resources influence clinical practice. In addition, there is still little information about adoption and use of these technologies by HCPs inclinical practice in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Method: An exploratory descriptive design was adopted for this study. Thirty-six (36) HCPs (18 nurses and 18 physicians) working in the clinical area in a tertiary health institution in SSA participated in this study. Using Qmethodology, study participants rank-ordered forty-six statementsin relation to their adoption and use of eHealth within their clinical practice.This was analysed using by-person factor analysis and complemented with audio-taped interviews.

Results: The analysis yielded four factors i.e., distinct viewpoints the HCPs hold about adoption and use of eHealth within their clinical practice. These factors include: "Patient-focused eHealth advocates" who use the eHealth because they are motivated by patients and their families preferences; "Task-focused eHealth advocates" use eHealth because it helps them complete clinical tasks; "Traditionalistic-pragmatists" recognise contributions eHealth makes in clinical practice but separate from their routine clinical activities; and the "Tech-focused eHealth advocates" who use the eHealth because they are motivated by the technology itself.

Conclusion: The study shows the equivocal viewpoints that HCPs have about eHealth within their clinical practice. This, in addition to adding to existing literature, will help policymakers/decision makers to consider HCPs views about these technologies prior to implementing an eHealth resource.

Citing Articles

Digital health readiness - insights from healthcare leaders in operational management: a cross-sectional survey.

Steenkamp I, Peltonen L, Chipps J BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):240.

PMID: 39939988 PMC: 11823159. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12129-y.

Stakeholders' Perspectives on the Application of New Diagnostic Devices for Urinary Schistosomiasis in Oyo State, Nigeria: A Q-Methodology Approach.

Samenjo K, Bengtson M, Onasanya A, Zambrano J, Oladunni O, Oladepo O Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022; 10(4).

PMID: 36041843 PMC: 9426976. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00780.

Sustainability of the Effects and Impacts of Using Digital Technology to Extend Maternal Health Services to Rural and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Experience From Southwest Nigeria.

Akeju D, Okusanya B, Okunade K, Ajepe A, Allsop M, Ebenso B Front Glob Womens Health. 2022; 3:696529.

PMID: 35211694 PMC: 8861509. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.696529.

The Interplay Between Technology Performativity and Health Care Professionals in Hospital Settings: Service Design Approach.

Ogundaini O, de la Harpe R JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(1):e23236.

PMID: 34982713 PMC: 8767474. DOI: 10.2196/23236.

Examining perspectives on the adoption and use of computer-based patient-reported outcomes among clinicians and health professionals: a Q methodology study.

Burton S, Valenta A, Starren J, Abraham J, Nelson T, Kochendorfer K J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021; 29(3):443-452.

PMID: 34871423 PMC: 8800531. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab257.

References

Stenner P, Dancey C, Watts S . The understanding of their illness amongst people with irritable bowel syndrome: a Q methodological study. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51(3):439-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00475-x. View

Ruland C, Bakken S . Representing patient preference-related concepts for inclusion in electronic health records. J Biomed Inform. 2002; 34(6):415-22. DOI: 10.1006/jbin.2002.1035. View

Timmons S . Nurses resisting information technology. Nurs Inq. 2003; 10(4):257-69. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00177.x. View

Hier D, Rothschild A, LeMaistre A, Keeler J . Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record one year after implementation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 2):1300-3. View

Bossen C . Test the artefact--develop the organization. The implementation of an electronic medication plan. Int J Med Inform. 2006; 76(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.01.001. View

Joos D, Chen Q, Jirjis J, Johnson K . An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007; :394-8. PMC: 1839545. View

Harrison M, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S . Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care--an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14(5):542-9. PMC: 1975796. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2384. View

Koivunen M, Hatonen H, Valimaki M . Barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of an interactive Internet-portal application for patient education in psychiatric hospitals. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 70(3):412-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.002. View

Akhtar-Danesh N, Baumann A, Cordingley L . Q-methodology in nursing research: a promising method for the study of subjectivity. West J Nurs Res. 2008; 30(6):759-73. DOI: 10.1177/0193945907312979. View

10.

Eley R, Fallon T, Soar J, Buikstra E, Hegney D . Barriers to use of information and computer technology by Australia's nurses: a national survey. J Clin Nurs. 2009; 18(8):1151-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02336.x. View

11.

Verhoeven F, Steehouder M, Hendrix R, van Gemert-Pijnen J . Factors affecting health care workers' adoption of a website with infection control guidelines. Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78(10):663-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.001. View

12.

Terry A, Giles G, Brown J, Thind A, Stewart M . Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers' perspective. Fam Med. 2009; 41(7):508-12. View

13.

Hains I, Fuller J, Ward R, Pearson S . Standardizing care in medical oncology: are Web-based systems the answer?. Cancer. 2009; 115(23):5579-88. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24600. View

14.

Gagnon M, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P . Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst. 2010; 36(1):241-77. PMC: 4011799. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4. View

15.

Lupianez-Villanueva F, Hardey M, Torrent J, Ficapal P . The integration of Information and Communication Technology into nursing. Int J Med Inform. 2010; 80(2):133-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.001. View

16.

Buntin M, Burke M, Hoaglin M, Blumenthal D . The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011; 30(3):464-71. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0178. View

17.

Petit Dit Dariel O, Wharrad H, Windle R . Exploring the underlying factors influencing e-learning adoption in nurse education. J Adv Nurs. 2012; 69(6):1289-300. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06120.x. View

18.

Brewster L, Mountain G, Wessels B, Kelly C, Hawley M . Factors affecting front line staff acceptance of telehealth technologies: a mixed-method systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2013; 70(1):21-33. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12196. View

19.

Al-Jafar E . Exploring patient satisfaction before and after electronic health record (EHR) implementation: the Kuwait experience. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2013; 10:1c. PMC: 3692323. View

20.

Gagnon M, Nsangou E, Payne-Gagnon J, Grenier S, Sicotte C . Barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic prescription: a systematic review of user groups' perceptions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 21(3):535-41. PMC: 3994867. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002203. View