» Articles » PMID: 31038811

Phenotypic Sexual Dimorphism is Associated with Genomic Signatures of Resolved Sexual Conflict

Overview
Journal Mol Ecol
Date 2019 May 1
PMID 31038811
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intralocus sexual conflict, where an allele benefits one sex at the expense of the other, has an important role in shaping genetic diversity of populations through balancing selection. However, the potential for mating systems to exert balancing selection through sexual conflict on the genome remains unclear. Furthermore, the nature and potential for resolution of sexual conflict across the genome has been hotly debated. To address this, we analysed de novo transcriptomes from six avian species, chosen to reflect the full range of sexual dimorphism and mating systems. Our analyses combine expression and population genomic statistics across reproductive and somatic tissue, with measures of sperm competition and promiscuity. Our results reveal that balancing selection is weakest in the gonad, consistent with the resolution of sexual conflict and evolutionary theory that phenotypic sex differences are associated with lower levels of ongoing conflict. We also demonstrate a clear link between variation in sexual conflict and levels of genetic variation across phylogenetic space in a comparative framework. Our observations suggest that this conflict is short-lived, and is resolved via the decoupling of male and female gene expression patterns, with important implications for the role of sexual selection in adaptive potential and role of dimorphism in facilitating sex-specific fitness optima.

Citing Articles

Role-reversed polyandry is associated with faster fast-Z in shorebirds.

Wanders K, Chen G, Feng S, Szekely T, Urrutia A Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2024):20240397.

PMID: 38864333 PMC: 11285523. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0397.


Increased male-induced harm in response to female-limited selection: interactive effects between intra- and interlocus sexual conflict?.

Romero-Haro A, Perez-Rodriguez L, Tschirren B Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(1997):20230140.

PMID: 37122249 PMC: 10130724. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0140.


Two Forms of Sexual Dimorphism in Gene Expression in Drosophila melanogaster: Their Coincidence and Evolutionary Genetics.

Singh A, Agrawal A Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(5).

PMID: 37116199 PMC: 10162685. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad091.


The roles of sexual selection and sexual conflict in shaping patterns of genome and transcriptome variation.

Tosto N, Beasley E, Wong B, Mank J, Flanagan S Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(7):981-993.

PMID: 36959239 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02019-7.


Experimental sexual selection reveals rapid evolutionary divergence in sex-specific transcriptomes and their interactions following mating.

Veltsos P, Porcelli D, Fang Y, Cossins A, Ritchie M, Snook R Mol Ecol. 2022; 31(12):3374-3388.

PMID: 35437824 PMC: 9325514. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16473.


References
1.
Wright A, Mank J . The scope and strength of sex-specific selection in genome evolution. J Evol Biol. 2013; 26(9):1841-53. PMC: 4352339. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12201. View

2.
Parsch J, Ellegren H . The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 2013; 14(2):83-7. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3376. View

3.
Gilks W, Abbott J, Morrow E . Sex differences in disease genetics: evidence, evolution, and detection. Trends Genet. 2014; 30(10):453-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.08.006. View

4.
Korneliussen T, Moltke I . NgsRelate: a software tool for estimating pairwise relatedness from next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(24):4009-11. PMC: 4673978. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv509. View

5.
Bhatia G, Patterson N, Sankararaman S, Price A . Estimating and interpreting FST: the impact of rare variants. Genome Res. 2013; 23(9):1514-21. PMC: 3759727. DOI: 10.1101/gr.154831.113. View