Complete Reoperation in Orthognathic Surgery
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Complete reoperation is defined as undergoing reoperative/repeated jaw osteotomies, in a patient who previously underwent orthognathic surgery. The purpose of this study is to (1) describe jaw positions at three time-points (before primary and before and after reoperative surgery), (2) investigate factors necessitating reoperation, and (3) outline the technical challenges.
Methods: Repeated orthognathic surgery cases >1-year out were included. Demographic, radiologic, and perioperative data were compiled. Repeated osteotomies (Le-Fort and/or bilateral split sagittal osteotomy, with or without genioplasty), were compared to their respective primary procedures. Statistical analysis was performed using t tests and z-scores.
Results: Fifteen patients were included (28.1 years; 71 percent female). Reoperative/repeated surgery was most often needed to address iatrogenic bony malposition and asymmetry. Relapse was a less common indication. Time between reoperative and primary surgery was 14 months. Sagittal discrepancies (p = 0.029) were the most frequent reason for primary orthognathic surgery (e.g., mandibular hypoplasia (p = 0.023). Reoperative/repeated orthognathic was performed for asymmetry (p = 0.014). Repeated procedures used more 3-dimensional planning (p < 0.001), required all three osteotomies (p = 0.034), had longer operative times (p = 0.078), and all required hardware removal (p < 0.001). Anatomical outcomes were good with 100% patient satisfaction at long-term follow-up.
Conclusions: Reoperative/repeated orthognathic surgery is challenging and underreported in the literature. Whereas primary orthognathic typically addressed sagittal discrepancies, reoperative/repeated osteotomies were needed to correct iatrogenic bone malposition and asymmetries. Challenges include: re-planning, scar burden, need to remove integrated hardware, and repeated osteotomy/fixation. Despite these difficulties, outcomes and patient acceptance were good.
Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV.
Does orthognathic surgery affect tooth root length and volume: a retrospective cohort study.
Erdem M, Irgin C Angle Orthod. 2025; 95(2):188-198.
PMID: 39799969 PMC: 11842105. DOI: 10.2319/052024-390.1.
Virtual Planning and 3D Printing in Contemporary Orthognathic Surgery.
Roy T, Steinbacher D Semin Plast Surg. 2022; 36(3):169-182.
PMID: 36532897 PMC: 9750797. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760209.
Ahmad A, Osman M, Awadalkreem F Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022; 95:107219.
PMID: 35623120 PMC: 9133749. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107219.
Current trends in orthognathic surgery.
Seo H, Choi Y Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022; 22(6):287-295.
PMID: 34974683 PMC: 8721433. DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2021.00598.
Chou P, Denadai R, Chen C, Chien-Jung Pai B, Hsu K, Chang C J Clin Med. 2019; 8(11).
PMID: 31652792 PMC: 6912447. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8111760.