» Articles » PMID: 31031512

Methods for Quantitative Characterization of Bone Injury from Computed-tomography Images

Overview
Date 2019 Apr 30
PMID 31031512
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) images can potentially provide insights into bone structure for diagnosis of disorders and diseases. However, evaluation of trabecular bone structure and whole bone shape is often qualitative or semi-quantitative. This limits inter-study comparisons and the ability to detect subtle bone quality variations during early disease onset or in response to new treatments. In this work, we enable quantitative characterization of bone diseases through bone morphometry, texture analysis, and shape analysis methods. The potential of our analysis methods to identify the impact of hemophilia is validated in a mouse femur wound model. In our results, shape localizes and characterizes the formation of spurious bone, and our texture and bone morphometry analysis results provide extra information about the composition of that bone. Some of our one-dimensional (1D) textural features were able to significantly differentiate our injured femurs from our healthy femurs, even with this small sample size demonstrating the potential of the proposed analysis framework. While trabecular bone morphometrics have been a pillar in 3D microCT bone research for decades, the proposed analysis framework augments how we define and understand phenotypical presentation of bone disease. The contributed open source software is exposed to the medical image analysis community through 3D Slicer extensions to ensure both robustness and reproducibility.

Citing Articles

Three-Dimensional (3D) Analysis of Orbital Morphometry in Healthy Anatolian Adults: Sex, Side Discrepancies, and Clinical Relevance.

Erdem H, Tekeli M, Cevik Y, Kilic Safak N, Kaya O, Boyan N Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e45208.

PMID: 37842472 PMC: 10576211. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45208.

References
1.
Roosendaal G, Van Rinsum A, Vianen M, van den Berg H, Lafeber F, Bijlsma J . Haemophilic arthropathy resembles degenerative rather than inflammatory joint disease. Histopathology. 1999; 34(2):144-53. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1999.00608.x. View

2.
Hildebrand T, Laib A, Muller R, Dequeker J, Ruegsegger P . Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res. 1999; 14(7):1167-74. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1167. View

3.
Sokoloff L . Biochemical and physiological aspects of degenerative joint diseases with special reference to hemophilic arthropathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975; 240:285-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb53362.x. View

4.
Cooper C, Snow S, McAlindon T, Kellingray S, Stuart B, Coggon D . Risk factors for the incidence and progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000; 43(5):995-1000. DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200005)43:5<995::AID-ANR6>3.0.CO;2-1. View

5.
Hooiveld M, Roosendaal G, Jacobs K, Vianen M, van den Berg H, Bijlsma J . Initiation of degenerative joint damage by experimental bleeding combined with loading of the joint: a possible mechanism of hemophilic arthropathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 50(6):2024-31. DOI: 10.1002/art.20284. View