Global Initiative for Asthma 2016-derived Asthma Control with Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol: A Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) Study Reanalysis
Overview
Pulmonary Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Background: In 2004, the landmark Gaining Optimal Asthma Control (GOAL) study demonstrated that most patients can achieve asthma control through sustained treatment and that adding a long-acting β-adrenoreceptor agonist to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is more effective than ICS alone in this regard. Definitions of asthma control have since evolved, and the consequent implications for the GOAL study findings are unclear.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol and fluticasone propionate alone in achieving and maintaining asthma control, as derived from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2016 report.
Methods: In total, 3416 patients were stratified by prior medication (ICS-naive [stratum 1], low-dose ICS [stratum 2], or medium-dose ICS [stratum 3]) and randomized to receive fluticasone propionate and salmeterol or fluticasone propionate. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving well-controlled or partly controlled asthma; secondary end points included the proportion of patients achieving well-controlled asthma. Control was evaluated during the last 4 weeks of each dose titration.
Results: In all strata, more patients achieved well-controlled or partly controlled asthma with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol vs fluticasone propionate alone (stratum 1: 91% vs 85%; P = .003; stratum 2: 86% vs 82%; P = .07; and stratum 3: 76% vs 66%; P < .001), as well as patients with well-controlled asthma (stratum 1: 64% vs 56%; P = .005; stratum 2: 59% vs 41%; P < .001; and stratum 3: 40% vs 22%; P < .001).
Conclusion: A markedly higher proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma in each stratum achieved control according to GINA 2016 criteria compared with the original study criteria. The proportion of patients achieving control remained greater with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol than with fluticasone propionate alone.
Vaghi A, Antonelli Incalzi R, Barbaglia S, Bilo M, Bini F, Carone M Clin Transl Allergy. 2025; 15(2):e70037.
PMID: 39924642 PMC: 11807766. DOI: 10.1002/clt2.70037.
Ismail A, Hyder Ali I, Wong C, Ban A, Mz Zahrah F, Lem L Pulm Ther. 2024; 11(1):25-40.
PMID: 39520649 PMC: 11861446. DOI: 10.1007/s41030-024-00278-8.
Biologic therapies for severe asthma with persistent type 2 inflammation.
Chandrasekara S, Wark P Aust Prescr. 2024; 47(2):36-42.
PMID: 38737370 PMC: 11081739. DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.015.
Symptom exacerbation control: an evolution in GINA guidelines?.
Latorre M, Pistelli R, Carpagnano G, Celi A, Puxeddu I, Scichilone N Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2023; 17:17534666231159261.
PMID: 37646243 PMC: 10469243. DOI: 10.1177/17534666231159261.
Van Tho N, Quan V, Dung D, Phu N, Dinh-Xuan A, Lan L J Pers Med. 2023; 13(5).
PMID: 37240979 PMC: 10222601. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050809.