» Articles » PMID: 31026082

Effects of Nonpharmacological Interventions on Functioning of People Living with Dementia at Home: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

Overview
Specialties Geriatrics
Psychiatry
Date 2019 Apr 27
PMID 31026082
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Slowing functional decline could enable people living with dementia to live for longer and more independently in their own homes. We aimed to update previous syntheses examining the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing functional decline (activities of daily living, activity-specific physical functioning, or function-specific goal attainment) in people living in their own homes with dementia.

Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases from January 2012 to May 2018; two researchers independently rated risk of bias of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) fitting predetermined inclusion criteria using a checklist; we narratively synthesised findings, prioritising studies judged to have a lower risk of bias.

Results: Twenty-nine papers (describing 26 RCTs) met eligibility criteria, of which we judged 13 RCTs to have a lower risk of bias. Study interventions were evaluated in four groups: physical exercise, occupational, multicomponent, and cognition-oriented interventions. Four out of 13 RCTs reported functional ability as a primary outcome. In studies judged to have a lower risk of bias, in-home tailored exercise, individualised cognitive rehabilitation, and in-home activities-focussed occupational therapy significantly reduced functional decline relative to control groups in individual studies. There was consistent evidence from studies at low risk of bias that group-based exercise and reminiscence therapies were ineffective at reducing functional decline.

Conclusion: We found no replicated evidence of intervention effectiveness in decreasing functional decline. Interventions associated with slower functional decline in individual trials have been individually delivered and tailored to the needs of the person with dementia. This is consistent with previous findings. Future intervention trials should prioritise these approaches.

Citing Articles

Pre-implementation planning for a new personalised, dementia post-diagnostic support intervention: exploring the perspective of professional stakeholders.

Dar A, Budgett J, Zabihi S, Whitfield E, Lang I, Rapaport P BJPsych Open. 2024; 10(5):e139.

PMID: 39103976 PMC: 11698165. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.733.


A psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for independence in dementia (NIDUS-Family) versus goal setting and routine care: a single-masked, phase 3, superiority, randomised controlled trial.

Cooper C, Vickerstaff V, Barber J, Phillips R, Ogden M, Walters K Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024; 5(2):e141-e151.

PMID: 38310894 PMC: 10834374. DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00262-3.


Cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild to moderate dementia.

Kudlicka A, Martyr A, Bahar-Fuchs A, Sabates J, Woods B, Clare L Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 6:CD013388.

PMID: 37389428 PMC: 10310315. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013388.pub2.


Interdisciplinary Approaches to Deal with Alzheimer's Disease-From Bench to Bedside: What Feasible Options Do Already Exist Today?.

Ablinger I, Dressel K, Rott T, Lauer A, Tiemann M, Batista J Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11).

PMID: 36428494 PMC: 9687885. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112922.


Effectiveness of home-based, non-exercise interventions for dementia: A systematic review.

Tan D, Boo B, Chong C, Tan M, Wong B Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:846271.

PMID: 36034133 PMC: 9403464. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.846271.