» Articles » PMID: 31025807

Guideline for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Assisted by Orthopaedic Surgical Robot

Overview
Journal Orthop Surg
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Apr 27
PMID 31025807
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The pedicle screw placement procedure is the most commonly used technique for spinal fixation and can provide reliable three-column stabilization. Accurate screw placement is necessary in clinical practice. To avoid screw malposition, which may decrease the stiffness of the screw-rod construct or increase the likelihood of neural and vascular injuries, the surgeons must fully understand the regional anatomy. Deformities, such as scoliosis, kyphosis or congenital anomalies, may complicate the application of the pedicle screw placement technique and increase the chance of screw encroachments. Incidences of pedicle screw malposition vary in different districts and hospitals and with surgeons and techniques. Today, the minimally invasive spinal surgery is well developed. However, the narrow corridors and limited views for surgeons increase the difficulty of pedicle screw placement and the possibility of screw encroachment. Evidenced by previous studies, robotic surgery can provide accurate screw placement, especially in settings of spinal deformities, anatomical anomalies, and minimally invasive procedures. Based on the consensus of consultant specialists, the literature review and our local experiences, this guideline introduces the robotic system and describes the workflow of robot-assisted procedures and the precautions to take during procedures. This guideline aims to outline a standardized method for robotic surgery for thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement.

Citing Articles

Comparison of accuracy of pedicle screw placement for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using freehand fluoroscopic, navigation, and robotic-assisted techniques - a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis.

Lajczak P, Ayesha A, Jabbar R, Silva Y, Sharma E, Sahin O Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):257.

PMID: 39982552 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03333-3.


Analysis of guide wire displacement in robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw implantation.

Liu Q, Wang R, Ru N, Wu Y, Guo C, Chen L J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):138.

PMID: 38554242 PMC: 10981612. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01876-z.


Impact of optical navigation variables on the accuracy of robot-assisted surgery: a study of the TIANJI Robot system.

Shi Z, Li Z, Fan M, Wang Q, Liu B, Lang Z J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):36.

PMID: 38231441 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01784-8.


Artificial Intelligence in Scoliosis: Current Applications and Future Directions.

Zhang H, Huang C, Wang D, Li K, Han X, Chen X J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068444 PMC: 10707441. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237382.


Minimally invasive percutaneous screw internal fixation under robot navigation for the treatment of a hamate bone fracture.

Jie F, Hui Z, Dawei Z, Guiqian L, Rongjian S, Weiya Q BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):929.

PMID: 38041112 PMC: 10691140. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06917-6.


References
1.
Jutte P, Castelein R . Complications of pedicle screws in lumbar and lumbosacral fusions in 105 consecutive primary operations. Eur Spine J. 2003; 11(6):594-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0469-8. View

2.
Katonis P, Christoforakis J, Kontakis G, Aligizakis A, Papadopoulos C, Sapkas G . Complications and problems related to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (411):86-94. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000068761.86536.1d. View

3.
BOUCHER H . A method of spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1959; 41-B(2):248-59. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.41B2.248. View

4.
Kim C, Lee Y, Taylor W, Oygar A, Kim W . Use of navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine J. 2008; 8(4):584-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.12.012. View

5.
Barnes A, Eguizabal J, Acosta Jr F, Lotz J, Buckley J, Ames C . Biomechanical pullout strength and stability of the cervical artificial pedicle screw. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(1):E16-20. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891772. View