» Articles » PMID: 31024495

A Risky Business? Habitat and Social Behavior Impact Skin and Gut Microbiomes in Caribbean Cleaning Gobies

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2019 Apr 27
PMID 31024495
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The broadstripe cleaning goby has two alternative ecotypes: sponge-dwellers, which live in large groups and feed mainly upon nematode parasites; and coral-dwellers, that live in small groups or in solitude and behave as cleaners. Recent studies focusing on the skin and gut microbiomes of tropical fish showed that microbial communities are influenced mainly by diet and host species. Here, we compare the skin and gut microbiomes of the Caribbean broadstripe cleaning goby alternative ecotypes (cleaners and non-cleaners) from Barbados and predict that different habitat use and behavior (cleaning vs. non-cleaning) will translate in different bacterial profiles between the two ecotypes. We found significant differences in both alpha- and beta-diversity of skin and gut microbiomes belonging to different ecotypes. Importantly, the skin microbiome of obligate cleaners showed greater intra-sample diversity and harbored a significantly higher prevalence of potential fish pathogens. Likewise, potential pathogens were also more prevalent in the gut of obligate cleaners. We suggest that habitat use, diet, but also direct contact with potential diseased clientele during cleaning, could be the cause for these patterns.

Citing Articles

Multidimensional variability of the microbiome of an invasive ascidian species.

Galia-Camps C, Banos E, Pascual M, Carreras C, Turon X iScience. 2023; 26(10):107812.

PMID: 37744040 PMC: 10514470. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107812.


Factors shaping the gut microbiome of five species of lizards from different habitats.

Vasconcelos D, Harris D, Damas-Moreira I, Pereira A, Xavier R PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15146.

PMID: 37187519 PMC: 10178224. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15146.


Skin bacterial microbiome diversity predicts lower activity levels in female, but not male, guppies, .

Kramp R, Kohl K, Stephenson J Biol Lett. 2022; 18(8):20220167.

PMID: 35975629 PMC: 9382456. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0167.


Fishing for the Microbiome of Tropical Tuna.

Gadoin E, Desnues C, dOrbcastel E, Bouvier T, Auguet J, Dagorn L Microb Ecol. 2022; 86(1):742-755.

PMID: 35962839 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-022-02096-4.


Reef Location and Client Diversity Influence the Skin Microbiome of the Caribbean Cleaner Goby Elacatinus evelynae.

Pereira A, Soares M, Santos T, Pocas A, Perez-Losada M, Apprill A Microb Ecol. 2022; 85(2):372-382.

PMID: 35275230 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-022-01984-z.


References
1.
Clague G, Cheney K, Goldizen A, McCormick M, Waldie P, Grutter A . Long-term cleaner fish presence affects growth of a coral reef fish. Biol Lett. 2011; 7(6):863-5. PMC: 3210676. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0458. View

2.
Tung J, Barreiro L, Burns M, Grenier J, Lynch J, Grieneisen L . Social networks predict gut microbiome composition in wild baboons. Elife. 2015; 4. PMC: 4379495. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.05224. View

3.
Sun D, Cheney K, Werminghausen J, Meekan M, McCormick M, Cribb T . Presence of cleaner wrasse increases the recruitment of damselfishes to coral reefs. Biol Lett. 2015; 11(8). PMC: 4571678. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0456. View

4.
Soares M, Bshary R, Cardoso S, Cote I, Oliveira R . Face your fears: cleaning gobies inspect predators despite being stressed by them. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e39781. PMC: 3384605. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039781. View

5.
Burns A, Stephens W, Stagaman K, Wong S, Rawls J, Guillemin K . Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development. ISME J. 2015; 10(3):655-64. PMC: 4817674. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.142. View