» Articles » PMID: 31022725

Transition from Video-assisted Thoracoscopic to Robotic Esophagectomy: a Single Surgeon's Experience

Overview
Journal Dis Esophagus
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 Apr 26
PMID 31022725
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lymph node dissection (LND) along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is a technically challenging part of esophageal cancer surgery, especially after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Robotic surgery holds promise to increase its safety and feasibility. The aim of this study was to describe a single thoracoscopic surgeon's experience related to the transition from video-assisted esophagectomy (VATE) to robotic esophagectomy (RE)-with a special focus on the safety of left RLN LND. Patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy and RLN dissection following CRT were dichotomized according to the use of robotic surgery (robotic esophagectomy [RE] versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy [VATE]). The following parameters were determined: (1) number of dissected nodes, (2) rates of RLN palsy, (3) rates of perioperative complications, and (4) learning curve. Learning curve analysis was performed using the 10-patient moving average (MA) for operation times and with the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method for left RLN LND (target failure rate: 15%). The RE and VATE groups consisted of 39 and 67 patients, respectively. The intraoperative identification of the left RLN was more common in the RE group (97.4%) than in the VATE group (68.7%; P < 0.001). Postoperative left RLN palsy was significantly more frequent in the VATE group (26.9%) than in the RE group (10.3%; P = 0.042), with a higher rate of pneumonia in the former (16.4% versus 2.6%; P = 0.03). The MA chart revealed a downward trend followed by a flattening of the RE operation time at operation number 17 and 29, respectively. CUSUM analysis showed that the left RLN palsy rate decreased to the target rate after 12 operations. We conclude that at least 12 cases are required for a surgeon with prior experience in VATE to safely accomplish left RLN LND through a robotic approach.

Citing Articles

Multicentre randomized clinical trial on robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy (REVATE trial).

Chao Y, Li Z, Jiang H, Wen Y, Chiu C, Li B Br J Surg. 2024; 111(7).

PMID: 38960881 PMC: 11221944. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae143.


Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.

Perry R, Barbosa J, Perry I, Barbosa J J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):125.

PMID: 38492067 PMC: 10944433. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01880-3.


Single-center experience of transitioning from video-assisted laparoscopic to robotic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication for esophageal motility disorders.

Jiang X, Ye C, Jiang L, Wei G, Dai S, Xi Y BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):341.

PMID: 37950218 PMC: 10638721. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02202-4.


Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen H, Liu Y, Peng H, Wang R, Wang K, Li D Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 10(11):4601-4616.

PMID: 35116317 PMC: 8798469. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-21-1482.


The Value of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy in Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Gantxegi A, Kingma B, Ruurda J, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Luyer M, van Hillegersberg R Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 29(2):1347-1356.

PMID: 34845567 PMC: 8724204. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10810-8.