» Articles » PMID: 31020000

Predictors of Successful Endovascular Treatment in Severe Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Apr 26
PMID 31020000
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the thrombus characteristics affecting the extent of recanalization to identify patients with severe cerebral venous sinus thrombus (CVT) more likely to benefit from endovascular therapy.

Methods: Severe CVT patients scheduled for endovascular treatment were prospectively recruited into the study. Each thrombosed venous segment was evaluated regarding complete or partial recanalization based on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after treatment. Magnetic resonance black-blood thrombus imaging (MRBTI) was performed 1 day before endovascular treatment. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the clot, age of the clot, and baseline volume of the clot were compared between the complete and partial recanalization groups. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between these clot characteristics and recanalization status.

Results: Twenty-one CVT patients undergoing endovascular therapy were prospectively included. There were 110 thrombosed segments, 54 of these segments were completely recanalized after endovascular treatment. An acute clot sign (ACS) was found in 39 segments and a subacute clot sign (SCS) was found in 71 segments. There was no significant difference on baseline volume of the clot (1638.8 ± 1432.2 mm vs. 1957.5 ± 2056.1 mm,  > 0.05) between the complete and partial recanalization groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that ACS on MRBTI was associated with complete recanalization ( < 0.001, odds ratio = 3.937, 95% confidence interval, 1.6-9.5).

Interpretation: ACS can be used to predict complete recanalization in patients undergoing endovascular treatment. MRBTI provides a robust method to define clot composition and is potentially useful in selecting the most appropriate CVT patients for endovascular treatment.

Citing Articles

Dumbbell-shaped thrombectomy device for cerebral venous sinus thrombus removal with controllable axial and longitudinal maneuverability.

Li M, Song B, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Cao X, Zhang H Natl Sci Rev. 2025; 12(3):nwaf015.

PMID: 39958147 PMC: 11827591. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf015.


Evolution and advances in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

Kan Y, Song B, Jiang M, Zhang Y, Li C, Wu C Int J Med Sci. 2024; 21(13):2450-2463.

PMID: 39439462 PMC: 11492885. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.99362.


Making acute ischemic stroke thrombi visible in MRI imaging.

Velasco Gonzalez A, Buerke B, Gorlich D, Sauerland C, Fobker M, Jeibmann A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12325.

PMID: 38811621 PMC: 11137124. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62985-1.


Endovascular Treatment for Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: Comparison among Different Endovascular Procedures.

Anush Rangarajan S, Ramachandran D, Mishra T, Gunaseelan V, Dash G, Philip V Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2024; 27(2):140-145.

PMID: 38751919 PMC: 11093168. DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_965_23.


SIRT1-Mediated HMGB1 Deacetylation Suppresses Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Related to Blood-Brain Barrier Impairment After Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.

Mu S, Li Z, Lin L, Wang D, Yang F, Chen L Mol Neurobiol. 2024; 61(8):6060-6076.

PMID: 38267754 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-024-03959-2.


References
1.
Stolz E, Trittmacher S, Rahimi A, Gerriets T, Rottger C, Siekmann R . Influence of recanalization on outcome in dural sinus thrombosis: a prospective study. Stroke. 2004; 35(2):544-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000112972.09096.65. View

2.
Leach J, Fortuna R, Jones B, Gaskill-Shipley M . Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis: current techniques, spectrum of findings, and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics. 2006; 26 Suppl 1:S19-41. DOI: 10.1148/rg.26si055174. View

3.
Khandelwal N, Agarwal A, Kochhar R, Bapuraj J, Singh P, Prabhakar S . Comparison of CT venography with MR venography in cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(6):1637-43. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1249. View

4.
Rahman M, Velat G, Hoh B, Mocco J . Direct thrombolysis for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2009; 27(5):E7. DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.FOCUS09146. View

5.
Einhaupl K, Stam J, Bousser M, de Bruijn S, Ferro J, Martinelli I . EFNS guideline on the treatment of cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis in adult patients. Eur J Neurol. 2010; 17(10):1229-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03011.x. View