» Articles » PMID: 31013802

Using Patient-Reported Outcomes to Predict Revision Arthroplasty Following Femoral Neck Fracture: Enhancing the Value of Clinical Registries Through Data Linkage

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Apr 25
PMID 31013802
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the association between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) six months following femoral neck fracture after a low fall and future arthroplasty, and the factors associated with this. Six-month post-fracture PROMs were collected from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR) for patients aged >55 years who were admitted for a femoral neck fracture after a low fall between March 2007 and June 2015. These cases were linked with those registered by Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) up to October 2016. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model to determine factors associated with future arthroplasty, including six-month PROMs. Of the 7077 hip fracture patients registered by VOTOR during the study period, 2325 met the inclusion criteria. Internal fixation being used for the initial hip fracture surgery, being younger and having no pre-injury disability were all independently associated with future revision or conversion to arthroplasty. Out of all PROMs, reporting pain and discomfort six months post-fracture was associated with a 9.5-fold increase in the risk of future arthroplasty (95% CI: 3.81, 23.67). The value of clinical registries can be enhanced via data linkage, in this case by using PROMs to predict arthroplasty following femoral neck fracture.

Citing Articles

Preliminary development of recommendations for the inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical quality registries.

Ruseckaite R, Maharaj A, Dean J, Krysinska K, Ackerman I, Brennan A BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):276.

PMID: 35232454 PMC: 8886855. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07657-4.


Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Predictors of Revision Lumbar Decompression Procedures.

Nolte M, Cha E, Lynch C, Jacob K, Patel M, Geoghegan C Neurospine. 2022; 18(4):863-870.

PMID: 35000342 PMC: 8752697. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2142230.115.


Collection and Reporting of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Arthroplasty Registries: Multinational Survey and Recommendations.

Bohm E, Kirby S, Trepman E, Hallstrom B, Rolfson O, Wilkinson J Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021; 479(10):2151-2166.

PMID: 34288899 PMC: 8445553. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001852.


Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries.

Ruseckaite R, Maharaj A, Krysinska K, Dean J, Ahern S Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019; 10:355-372.

PMID: 31849553 PMC: 6911317. DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S229569.

References
1.
Spangler L, Cummings P, Tencer A, Mueller B, Mock C . Biomechanical factors and failure of transcervical hip fracture repair. Injury. 2001; 32(3):223-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00186-8. View

2.
Mathews V, Cabanela M . Femoral neck nonunion treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (419):57-64. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200402000-00010. View

3.
Heetveld M, Raaymakers E, van Eck-Smit B, van Walsum A, Luitse J . Internal fixation for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. Does bone density affect clinical outcome?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(3):367-73. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15715. View

4.
Ridgeway S, Wilson J, Charlet A, Kafatos G, Pearson A, Coello R . Infection of the surgical site after arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(6):844-50. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15121. View

5.
Parker M, Gurusamy K . Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; (4):CD001708. PMC: 8407320. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001708.pub2. View