» Articles » PMID: 31011906

Recurrence of Melanoma After a Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy: Predictors and Impact of Recurrence Site on Survival

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Apr 24
PMID 31011906
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Factors that predict melanoma recurrence after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are not well-defined. We evaluated melanoma recurrence patterns, factors prognostic for recurrence, and the impact of recurrence on outcomes after a negative SLNB.

Methods: The Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group database was evaluated from 1996 to 2016 for negative SLNB melanoma patients. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with recurrence, overall survival (OS), and melanoma-specific survival (MSS).

Results: Median follow-up was 32.1 months. Recurrences developed in 558 of 5351 negative SLN patients (10.4%). First-site of recurrence included a local or in-transit recurrence (LITR) in 221 cases (4.1%), nodal recurrence (NR) in 109 cases (2%), and distant recurrence (DR) in 220 cases (4.1%). On multivariable analysis, age, thickness, head/neck or lower extremity primary, and microsatellitosis significantly predicted for an LITR as first-site. Having an LITR as first-site significantly predicted for a subsequent NR and DR, and significantly predicted for worse OS and MSS. Furthermore, thickness and head/neck or lower extremity primary significantly predicted for an NR as first-site, while a prior LITR significantly predicted for a subsequent NR. Factors significantly predictive for a DR included thickness, head/neck or trunk primary, ulceration, and lymphovascular invasion. Patients with any type of locoregional recurrence were at higher risk for a DR.

Conclusions: Recurrences occur in 10.4% of negative SLN patients, with LITR and DR being the most common types. Importantly, having an LITR significantly predicts for a subsequent NR and DR, and is prognostic for worse survival after a negative SLNB.

Citing Articles

Individualized Prediction for Risk of Recurrence in Stage I/II Melanoma Patients With Negative Sentinel Lymph Node.

Chang S, Lourdault K, Grunkemeier G, Hanes D, Chiu S, Stern S Cancer Med. 2024; 13(23):e70441.

PMID: 39611693 PMC: 11605731. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70441.


False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: a single-surgeon experience.

Downey J, DeVries K, Lano I, Baliski C Can J Surg. 2024; 67(5):E337-E344.

PMID: 39332833 PMC: 11444684. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.016023.


Use of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test to Aid in the Decision of Adjuvant Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma.

Hunt J J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024; 15(4):277-280.

PMID: 39301099 PMC: 11409774. DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.4.5.


Stage IIA Cutaneous Melanoma: Do Regional Ultrasound and CT scan Improve Detection of Relapses? A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

Briatico G, Brancaccio G, Moscarella E, Longo C, Borsari S, Ruggeri R Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 39122509 PMC: 11313639. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.1403a155.


Cancer metastasis through the lymphatic versus blood vessels.

Leong S, Witte M Clin Exp Metastasis. 2024; 41(4):387-402.

PMID: 38940900 PMC: 11374872. DOI: 10.1007/s10585-024-10288-0.