» Articles » PMID: 31009079

Two-dimensional Ultrasound-computed Tomography Image Registration for Monitoring Percutaneous Hepatic Intervention

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2019 Apr 23
PMID 31009079
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Deformable registration of ultrasound (US) and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images are essential for quantitative comparison of ablation boundaries and dimensions determined using these modalities. This comparison is essential as stiffness-based imaging using US has become popular and offers a nonionizing and cost-effective imaging modality for monitoring minimally invasive microwave ablation procedures. A sensible manual registration method is presented that performs the required CT-US image registration.

Methods: The two-dimensional (2D) virtual CT image plane that corresponds to the clinical US B-mode was obtained by "virtually slicing" the 3D CT volume along the plane containing non-anatomical landmarks, namely points along the microwave ablation antenna. The initial slice plane was generated using the vector acquired by rotating the normal vector of the transverse (i.e., xz) plane along the angle subtended by the antenna. This plane was then further rotated along the ablation antenna and shifted along with the direction of normal vector to obtain similar anatomical structures, such as the liver surface and vasculature that is visualized on both the CT virtual slice and US B-mode images on 20 patients. Finally, an affine transformation was estimated using anatomic and non-anatomic landmarks to account for distortion between the colocated CT virtual slice and US B-mode image resulting in a final registered CT virtual slice. Registration accuracy was measured by estimating the Euclidean distance between corresponding registered points on CT and US B-mode images.

Results: Mean and SD of the affine transformed registration error was 1.85 ± 2.14 (mm), computed from 20 coregistered data sets.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the ability to obtain 2D virtual CT slices that are registered to clinical US B-mode images. The use of both anatomical and non-anatomical landmarks result in accurate registration useful for validating ablative margins and comparison to electrode displacement elastography based images.

Citing Articles

Retrolaminar Demyelination of Structurally Intact Axons in Nonhuman Primate Experimental Glaucoma.

Chaudhary P, Lockwood H, Stowell C, Bushong E, Reynaud J, Yang H Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(2):36.

PMID: 38407858 PMC: 10902877. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.2.36.


Optic Nerve Head Myelin-Related Protein, GFAP, and Iba1 Alterations in Non-Human Primates With Early to Moderate Experimental Glaucoma.

Chaudhary P, Stowell C, Reynaud J, Gardiner S, Yang H, Williams G Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022; 63(11):9.

PMID: 36239974 PMC: 9586137. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.11.9.


[Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Thermal Ablation vs. Surgical Resection of Metachronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis].

Yao Z, Zhang K, Luo Y, Li Y, Yang C, Yang H Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022; 53(3):481-487.

PMID: 35642158 PMC: 10409420. DOI: 10.12182/20220560107.


Differential Imaging of Liver Tumors before and after Microwave Ablation with Electrode Displacement Elastography.

Pohlman R, Hinshaw J, Ziemlewicz T, Lubner M, Wells S, Lee Jr F Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021; 47(8):2138-2156.

PMID: 34011451 PMC: 8243838. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.027.


Adaptation of Dictionary Learning for Electrode Displacement Elastography.

Pohlman R, Varghese T Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020; 2020:2023-2026.

PMID: 33018401 PMC: 7538652. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175319.


References
1.
Yang W, Varghese T, Ziemlewicz T, Alexander M, Lubner M, Hinshaw J . Delineation of Post-Procedure Ablation Regions with Electrode Displacement Elastography with a Comparison to Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017; 43(9):1953-1962. PMC: 5523876. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.04.021. View

2.
Brace C . Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: what are the differences?. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009; 38(3):135-43. PMC: 2941203. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.10.001. View

3.
Kim A, Lee M, Cha D, Lim H, Oh Y, Jeong J . Automatic Registration between Real-Time Ultrasonography and Pre-Procedural Magnetic Resonance Images: A Prospective Comparison between Two Registration Methods by Liver Surface and Vessel and by Liver Surface Only. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016; 42(7):1627-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.02.008. View

4.
Krucker J, Xu S, Venkatesan A, Locklin J, Amalou H, Glossop N . Clinical utility of real-time fusion guidance for biopsy and ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011; 22(4):515-24. PMC: 3071444. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.10.033. View

5.
Lee D, Nam W, Lee J, Ra J . Non-rigid registration between 3D ultrasound and CT images of the liver based on intensity and gradient information. Phys Med Biol. 2010; 56(1):117-37. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/1/008. View