Role of Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Expression on Prognostic and Overall Survival of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Recently, the correlation of immunological checkpoint marker programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and the prognosis of various cancers has been a research hotspot. The aim of this study is to examine the prognostic effect of PD-L1 in breast cancer.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library database were searched for eligible studies and additional hand-searching were reviewed as an augmentation. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were estimated using fixed- or random-effect models.
Results: Data from 19 studies involving 12,505 patients were collected. Study quality was assessed according to guidelines for assessing quality in prognostic studies. PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (P < .001), high tumor grade (P < .001), negative hormone receptor (P < .001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity (P < .001), high Ki67 (P < .001), and high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (P < .001). PD-L1 expression had no significant impact on CSS (pooled HR 0.83, 95% CI = 0.64-1.09, P = .19) or MFS (pooled HR 1.11, 95% CI = 0.62-1.97, P = .72), but significantly correlated with shortened OS (pooled HR 1.52, 95% CI = 1.14-2.03, P = .004) and DFS (pooled HR 1.31, 95% CI = 1.14-1.51, P < .000). Subgroup analysis showed that not PD-L1 RNA expression, but protein expression was associated with shorter survival, in addition, the adverse prognostic effect of PD-L1 expression remained in luminal A, luminal B, and HER2 subtype, not in basal-like or triple-negative subtype.
Conclusions: An elevated PD-L1 expression significantly correlates with high-risk prognostic indicators and decreased survival in patients with breast cancer.
Ahmed S, Viode A, van Zalm P, Steen J, Mukerji S, Steen H J Neurovirol. 2022; 28(3):341-354.
PMID: 35639337 PMC: 9945916. DOI: 10.1007/s13365-022-01077-0.
PD-L1 CAR effector cells induce self-amplifying cytotoxic effects against target cells.
Bajor M, Graczyk-Jarzynka A, Marhelava K, Burdzinska A, Muchowicz A, Goral A J Immunother Cancer. 2022; 10(1).
PMID: 35078921 PMC: 8796262. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002500.
Ayoub N, Fares M, Marji R, Al Bashir S, Yaghan R Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021; 13:603-615.
PMID: 34803400 PMC: 8597920. DOI: 10.2147/BCTT.S333123.
Perspectives, Therapies, and Challenges for Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.
Salkeni M, Rizvi W, Hein K, Higa G Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021; 13:539-557.
PMID: 34602823 PMC: 8481821. DOI: 10.2147/BCTT.S288344.
Emerging Biomarkers and Targeted Therapies in Feline Mammary Carcinoma.
Gameiro A, Urbano A, Ferreira F Vet Sci. 2021; 8(8).
PMID: 34437486 PMC: 8402877. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8080164.