» Articles » PMID: 31007759

Development of QSAR Machine Learning-based Models to Forecast the Effect of Substances on Malignant Melanoma Cells

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Apr 23
PMID 31007759
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

SK-MEL-5 is a human melanoma cell line that has been used in various studies to explore new therapies against melanoma in different experiments. Based on this study we report on the development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models able to predict the cytotoxic effect of diverse chemical compounds on this cancer cell line. The dataset of cytotoxic and inactive compounds were downloaded from the PubChem database. It contains the data for all chemical compounds for which cytotoxicity results expressed by GI was recorded. In total 13 blocks of molecular descriptors were computed and used, after appropriate pre-processing in building QSAR models with four machine learning classifiers: Random forest (RF), gradient boosting, support vector machine and random k-nearest neighbors. Among the 186 models reported none had a positive predictive value (PPV) higher than 0.90 in both nested cross-validation and on an external dataset testing, but 7 models had a PPV higher than 0.85 in both evaluations, all seven using the RFs algorithm as a classifier, and topological descriptors, information indices, 2D-autocorrelation descriptors, P-VSA-like descriptors, and edge-adjacency descriptors as sets of features used for classification. The y-scrambling test was associated with considerably worse performance (confirming the non-random character of the models) and the applicability domain was assessed through three different methods.

Citing Articles

Recent Advances in Omics, Computational Models, and Advanced Screening Methods for Drug Safety and Efficacy.

Son A, Park J, Kim W, Yoon Y, Lee S, Ji J Toxics. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39591001 PMC: 11598288. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12110822.


Molecular Toxicity Virtual Screening Applying a Quantized Computational SNN-Based Framework.

Nascimben M, Rimondini L Molecules. 2023; 28(3).

PMID: 36771009 PMC: 9919191. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28031342.


Quantitative Structure-Toxicity Relationship in Bioactive Molecules from a Conceptual DFT Perspective.

Pal R, Patra S, Chattaraj P Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022; 15(11).

PMID: 36355555 PMC: 9695291. DOI: 10.3390/ph15111383.


Histopathological evaluation of cutaneous malignant melanoma: A retrospective study.

Mutu D, Avino A, Balcangiu-Stroescu A, Mehedintu M, Balan D, Brinduse L Exp Ther Med. 2022; 23(6):402.

PMID: 35601077 PMC: 9115627. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11329.


QSAR and Molecular Docking Studies of Pyrimidine-Coumarin-Triazole Conjugates as Prospective Anti-Breast Cancer Agents.

Subramani A, Sivaperuman A, Natarajan R, Bhandare R, Shaik A Molecules. 2022; 27(6).

PMID: 35335208 PMC: 8955476. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27061845.


References
1.
Svetnik V, Liaw A, Tong C, Culberson J, Sheridan R, Feuston B . Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003; 43(6):1947-58. DOI: 10.1021/ci034160g. View

2.
Fassihi A, Sabet R . QSAR study of p56(lck) protein tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity of flavonoid derivatives using MLR and GA-PLS. Int J Mol Sci. 2009; 9(9):1876-1892. PMC: 2635749. DOI: 10.3390/ijms9091876. View

3.
Sharma B, Singh P, Pilania P, Shekhawat M, Prabhakar Y . QSAR of 2-(4-methylsulphonylphenyl)pyrimidine derivatives as cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: simple structural fragments as potential modulators of activity. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2011; 27(2):249-60. DOI: 10.3109/14756366.2011.587414. View

4.
Karbakhsh R, Sabet R . Application of different chemometric tools in QSAR study of azolo-adamantanes against influenza A virus. Res Pharm Sci. 2011; 6(1):23-33. PMC: 3203269. View

5.
Sebaugh J . Guidelines for accurate EC50/IC50 estimation. Pharm Stat. 2012; 10(2):128-34. DOI: 10.1002/pst.426. View