» Articles » PMID: 31007738

Insulin Use and Fracture Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis of 138,690 Patients

Overview
Journal Exp Ther Med
Specialty Pathology
Date 2019 Apr 23
PMID 31007738
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been reported to have an enhanced risk of bone fracture, however the association between insulin treatment and risk of fracture in patients with T2DM remains to be fully elucidated. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to examine the possible association between insulin treatment and risk of fracture in patients with T2DM. Relevant studies published prior to and including April 2018 were identified by literature searches in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. A meta-analysis was performed, which included relevant trials of patients with T2DM comparing insulin to oral anti-diabetic drugs. The combined effect was expressed as a pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed to consolidate the results. A total of 7 studies comprising 138,690 patients were eligible for inclusion in the present meta-analysis. After exclusion of one study that introduced major heterogeneity, treatment with, insulin was associated with a significantly increased risk of fracture among patients with T2DM (RR=1.24, 95% CI, 1.07-1.44; P=0.004). Subgroup analysis by sex indicated that the RR for men was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.76-1.44, P=0.801) and that for women was 1.22 (95% CI, 0.92-1.62, P=0.175). Subgroup analysis by fracture site indicated that the RR for hip was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.83-1.68, P=0.363), that for vertebrae was 1.28 (95% CI, 0.90-1.81, P=0.169) and that for non-vertebrae was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.80-1.41, P=0.686). Subgroup analysis by study design suggested that the RR for prospective and retrospective studies was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.06-1.71, P=0.014) and 1.16 (95% CI, 0.99-1.35, P=0.059), respectively. Subgroup analysis by region indicated that the RR for Europe was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.91-1.48, P=0.220), that for North America was 1.24 (95% CI, 0.81-1.90, P=0.333) and that for Asia was 1.34 (95% CI, 0.91-1.98, P=0.141). In conclusion, treatment with insulin increased the risk of fractures among patients with T2DM compared with oral anti-diabetic drugs; however, the association was influenced by various factors, including sex, fracture site, study design and geographical region.

Citing Articles

Hypoglycemic agents and bone health; an umbrella systematic review of the clinical trials' meta-analysis studies.

Khashayar P, Rad F, Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Golabchi S, Khashayar P, Mohammadi M Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024; 16(1):310.

PMID: 39716250 PMC: 11665059. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-024-01518-2.


Impact of Different Anti-Hyperglycaemic Treatments on Bone Turnover Markers and Bone Mineral Density in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Saadi M, Das R, Mullath Ullas A, Powell D, Wilson E, Myrtziou I Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(14.

PMID: 39063229 PMC: 11277066. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147988.


The use of metformin, sulfonylurea compounds and insulin and the risk of hip fractures in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Bahardoust M, Yarali M, Donyadideh G, Rahimi E, Naderi D, Tehrani F BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):367.

PMID: 37161384 PMC: 10170842. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06493-9.


Reduced High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Is an Independent Determinant of Altered Bone Quality in Women with Type 2 Diabetes.

Dule S, Barchetta I, Cimini F, Passarella G, Dellanno A, Filardi T Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(7).

PMID: 37047445 PMC: 10095189. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076474.


Diabetes and bone.

de Araujo I, Moreira M, de Paula F Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2022; 66(5):633-641.

PMID: 36382752 PMC: 10118819. DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000552.


References
1.
Campos Pastor M, Escobar-Jimenez F, Serrano Pardo M . Intensive insulin therapy and bone mineral density in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(5):455-9. DOI: 10.1007/s001980070114. View

2.
Schwartz A, Sellmeyer D, Ensrud K, Cauley J, Tabor H, Schreiner P . Older women with diabetes have an increased risk of fracture: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86(1):32-8. DOI: 10.1210/jcem.86.1.7139. View

3.
Ivers R, Cumming R, Mitchell P, Peduto A . Diabetes and risk of fracture: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(7):1198-203. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.7.1198. View

4.
Kennedy R, Henry J, Chapman A, Nayar R, Grant P, Morris A . Accidents in patients with insulin-treated diabetes: increased risk of low-impact falls but not motor vehicle crashes--a prospective register-based study. J Trauma. 2002; 52(4):660-6. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200204000-00008. View

5.
Akune T, Ogata N, Hoshi K, Kubota N, Terauchi Y, Tobe K . Insulin receptor substrate-2 maintains predominance of anabolic function over catabolic function of osteoblasts. J Cell Biol. 2002; 159(1):147-56. PMC: 2173484. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200204046. View