» Articles » PMID: 31006313

Local Conduction Velocity in the Presence of Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Myocardial Wall Thinning: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study in a Swine Model of Healed Left Ventricular Infarction

Overview
Date 2019 Apr 23
PMID 31006313
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Conduction velocity (CV) is an important property that contributes to the arrhythmogenicity of the tissue substrate. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between local CV versus late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and myocardial wall thickness in a swine model of healed left ventricular infarction.

Methods: Six swine with healed myocardial infarction underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic mapping. Two healthy controls (one treated with amiodarone and one unmedicated) underwent electroanatomic mapping with identical protocols to establish the baseline CV. CV was estimated using a triangulation technique. LGE+ regions were defined as signal intensity >2 SD than the mean of remote regions, wall thinning+ as those with wall thickness <2 SD than the mean of remote regions. LGE heterogeneity was defined as SD of LGE in the local neighborhood of 5 mm and wall thickness gradient as SD within 5 mm. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and electroanatomic mapping data were registered, and hierarchical modeling was performed to estimate the mean difference of CV (LGE+/-, wall thinning+/-), or the change of the mean of CV per unit change (LGE heterogeneity, wall thickness gradient).

Results: Significantly slower CV was observed in LGE+ (0.33±0.25 versus 0.54±0.36 m/s; P<0.001) and wall thinning+ regions (0.38±0.28 versus 0.55±0.37 m/s; P<0.001). Areas with greater LGE heterogeneity ( P<0.001) and wall thickness gradient ( P<0.001) exhibited slower CV.

Conclusions: Slower CV is observed in the presence of LGE, myocardial wall thinning, high LGE heterogeneity, and a high wall thickness gradient. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance may offer a valuable imaging surrogate for estimating CV, which may support noninvasive identification of the arrhythmogenic substrate.

Citing Articles

High-density isochronal repolarization mapping and re-entry vulnerability estimation for scar-related ventricular tachycardia ablation: mechanistic basis, clinical application, and challenges.

Tonko J, Chow A, Lambiase P Europace. 2024; 26(11).

PMID: 39478673 PMC: 11601750. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae271.


The Primary Alteration of Ventricular Myocardium Conduction: The Significant Determinant of Left Bundle Branch Block Pattern.

Bacharova L, de Luna B Cardiol Res Pract. 2023; 2022:3438603.

PMID: 36589707 PMC: 9800102. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3438603.


Atrial conduction velocity mapping: clinical tools, algorithms and approaches for understanding the arrhythmogenic substrate.

Coveney S, Cantwell C, Roney C Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022; 60(9):2463-2478.

PMID: 35867323 PMC: 9365755. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02621-0.


A Mathematical Model for Electrical Activity in Pig Atrial Tissue.

Peris-Yague V, Rubio T, Fakuade F, Voigt N, Luther S, Majumder R Front Physiol. 2022; 13:812535.

PMID: 35360247 PMC: 8960738. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.812535.


Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Substrate for Ventricular Tachycardia With Hemodynamic Compromise.

Whitaker J, Neji R, Kim S, Connolly A, Aubriot T, Calvo J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:744779.

PMID: 34765656 PMC: 8576410. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.744779.


References
1.
Cabo C, Pertsov A, Baxter W, Davidenko J, Gray R, Jalife J . Wave-front curvature as a cause of slow conduction and block in isolated cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1994; 75(6):1014-28. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.75.6.1014. View

2.
Fry C, Gray R, Dhillon P, Jabr R, Dupont E, Patel P . Architectural correlates of myocardial conduction: changes to the topography of cellular coupling, intracellular conductance, and action potential propagation with hypertrophy in Guinea-pig ventricular myocardium. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7(6):1198-204. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001471. View

3.
Hunter P, Smaill B . The analysis of cardiac function: a continuum approach. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1988; 52(2):101-64. DOI: 10.1016/0079-6107(88)90004-1. View

4.
Alexandre J, Saloux E, Dugue A, Lebon A, Lemaitre A, Roule V . Scar extent evaluated by late gadolinium enhancement CMR: a powerful predictor of long term appropriate ICD therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013; 15:12. PMC: 3610203. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-12. View

5.
Richardson W, Clarke S, Quinn T, Holmes J . Physiological Implications of Myocardial Scar Structure. Compr Physiol. 2015; 5(4):1877-909. PMC: 4727398. DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c140067. View