» Articles » PMID: 31003919

Three-dimensional Cephalometry for Orthognathic Planning: Normative Data and Analyses

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Apr 21
PMID 31003919
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/purpose: The objective of this study was to create a normative database of 3D cephalometric measurements for adult Chinese in Taiwan to understand the specific features, as well as to provide information for 3-dimensional (3D) orthognathic surgery planning for patients with maxillofacial deformity.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 30 male and 30 female adults with normal and balanced facial appearance, skeletal Class I pattern, and proper interincisal relationship with normal occlusion. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed. After standard orientation of the 3D image models, 51 landmarks were digitized and 3D cephalometric measurements of overall facial features, midface, maxilla, mandible, dentoalveolus, and soft tissue were performed and analyzed.

Results: Reliability and reproducibility of the 3D measurement were achieved. The data showed significant differences between males and females in facial height ratio, midface prominence, midface and maxilla width, mandible width and length for the skeleton, lower incisal inclination and interincisal angle for the dentoalveolus, and lip height, facial height and chin throat angle for the soft tissue. These dataset presented specific facial characteristics of the Chinese face as compared with other populations.

Conclusion: The normative data helps to serve as a guide for maxillofacial treatment for globally ethnic Chinese, particularly useful for orthodontic treatment, 3D planning of orthognathic surgery and outcome assessment. Gender and ethnic differences need to be taken into consideration.

Citing Articles

The Maxillomandibular Sagittal Assessment: The ABwise Appraisal and Its Correlation with ANB Angle.

Boccalari E, Rossi O, Baldini B, Tripicchio C, Serafin M, Caprioglio A J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004908 PMC: 11856202. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041379.


Capabilities of Cephalometric Methods to Study X-rays in Three-Dimensional Space (Review).

Ayupova I, Makhota A, Kolsanov A, Popov N, Davidyuk M, Nekrasov I Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2024; 16(3):62-73.

PMID: 39650278 PMC: 11618529. DOI: 10.17691/stm2024.16.3.07.


Facial asymmetry outcome of orthognathic surgery in mild craniofacial microsomia compared to non-syndromic class II asymmetry.

Chen Y, Baan F, Berge S, Liao Y, Maal T, Xi T Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(9):502.

PMID: 39196436 PMC: 11358178. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05899-6.


Large Language Models Diagnose Facial Deformity.

Lee J, Xu X, Kim D, Deng H, Kuang T, Lampen N medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39040164 PMC: 11261925. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.11.24310274.


Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hendrickx J, Gracea R, Vanheers M, Winderickx N, Preda F, Shujaat S Eur J Orthod. 2024; 46(4).

PMID: 38895901 PMC: 11185929. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjae029.