» Articles » PMID: 31001187

Neuroplasticity of Language Networks in Aphasia: Advances, Updates, and Future Challenges

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Apr 20
PMID 31001187
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Researchers have sought to understand how language is processed in the brain, how brain damage affects language abilities, and what can be expected during the recovery period since the early 19th century. In this review, we first discuss mechanisms of damage and plasticity in the post-stroke brain, both in the acute and the chronic phase of recovery. We then review factors that are associated with recovery. First, we review organism intrinsic variables such as age, lesion volume and location and structural integrity that influence language recovery. Next, we review organism extrinsic factors such as treatment that influence language recovery. Here, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of language recovery and highlight recent work that emphasizes a network perspective of language recovery. Finally, we propose our interpretation of the principles of neuroplasticity, originally proposed by Kleim and Jones (1) in the context of extant literature in aphasia recovery and rehabilitation. Ultimately, we encourage researchers to propose sophisticated intervention studies that bring us closer to the goal of providing precision treatment for patients with aphasia and a better understanding of the neural mechanisms that underlie successful neuroplasticity.

Citing Articles

Distinct neural representations of different linguistic components following sign language learning.

Coldham Y, Haluts N, Elbaz E, Ben-David T, Racabi N, Gal S Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):353.

PMID: 40033011 PMC: 11876632. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07793-7.


EEG reveals brain network alterations in chronic aphasia during natural speech listening.

Mehraram R, Kries J, De Clercq P, Vandermosten M, Francart T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2441.

PMID: 39828755 PMC: 11743778. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86192-8.


EEG synchronization patterns during a Go/No-Go task in individuals with aphasia in subacute and chronic phases of stroke.

Rogala J, Choinski M, Szymaszek A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23774.

PMID: 39390109 PMC: 11467312. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75259-7.


Exercise and Language Performance in Healthy Aging, Stroke and Neurodegenerative Conditions: a Scoping Review.

Khalili R, Kehayia E, Roig M Can Geriatr J. 2024; 27(3):324-344.

PMID: 39234282 PMC: 11346622. DOI: 10.5770/cgj.27.707.


Early Boost of Linguistic Skills? Individualized Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Early Postacute Aphasia.

Rubi-Fessen I, Gerbershagen K, Stenneken P, Willmes K Brain Sci. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39199482 PMC: 11353206. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14080789.


References
1.
Meier E, Johnson J, Pan Y, Kiran S . The utility of lesion classification in predicting language and treatment outcomes in chronic stroke-induced aphasia. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019; 13(6):1510-1525. PMC: 6527352. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-019-00118-3. View

2.
Kleim J, Hogg T, VandenBerg P, Cooper N, Bruneau R, Remple M . Cortical synaptogenesis and motor map reorganization occur during late, but not early, phase of motor skill learning. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(3):628-33. PMC: 6729261. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3440-03.2004. View

3.
Wan C, Zheng X, Marchina S, Norton A, Schlaug G . Intensive therapy induces contralateral white matter changes in chronic stroke patients with Broca's aphasia. Brain Lang. 2014; 136:1-7. PMC: 4425280. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.011. View

4.
Dick A, Beharelle A, Solodkin A, Small S . Interhemispheric functional connectivity following prenatal or perinatal brain injury predicts receptive language outcome. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(13):5612-25. PMC: 3786176. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2851-12.2013. View

5.
Dijkhuizen R, Zaharchuk G, Otte W . Assessment and modulation of resting-state neural networks after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2014; 27(6):637-43. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000150. View