» Articles » PMID: 31001177

Statistical Differences in Set Analysis in Badminton at the RIO 2016 Olympic Games

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2019 Apr 20
PMID 31001177
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine statistical differences in a set of badminton competition matches in five different modalities with regard to competition level (Group Phase vs. Eliminatory Phase). Data from 453 sets (125 in men's singles; 108 sets in women's singles; 77 sets in men's doubles; 73 in women's doubles and 70 in mixed doubles) from the RIO 2016 Olympics Games were recorded and classified in two groups of variables to analyze variables related to match (5) and set (15). A descriptive analysis and univariate test (Mann-Whitney U) for non-parametric data were conducted. The results show in men's and women's singles all the variables related to match were higher in the Elimination Phase than in the Group Phase ( < 0.01). In Sets 1 and 3, the longest set duration, rally and average rally were found in the Elimination Phase than Group Stage ( < 0.05). In women's singles, these differences were also recorded in Set 2. For doubles, the results are more stable among groups. Men's doubles had a longer duration of the match and set (sets 1 and set 2) ( < 0.01), and also scored highest for average rally strokes (sets 1 3) ( < 0.05) and shuttles used in the Elimination Phase vs. the Group Phase along the match ( < 0.01). In women's doubles, more shuttles were used in a match in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. Moreover, the same results are established for Set 2, including for average rally. Mixed doubles saw no match going to three sets. However, the greatest differences showed a longer rally and average rally being registered in the Elimination than in the Group Phase. In conclusion, the timing factors of the badminton singles and doubles games were different in the Elimination and Group Phases. This information may help players and coaches prepare and administer different types of workouts or, more specifically, competition schedules adapted to the characteristics of modern badminton.

Citing Articles

Match-play data according to playing categories in badminton: a systematic review.

Winata B, Brochhagen J, Apriantono T, Hoppe M Front Sports Act Living. 2025; 7:1466778.

PMID: 40078442 PMC: 11897274. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1466778.


Optimizing Performance in Badminton Tournaments: The Relationship Between Timing, Quantity, and Quality Among Professional Players.

Hsu J, Lin H, Chiang H, Lee D, Lee Y, Huang C J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025; 10(1.

PMID: 39846646 PMC: 11755632. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk10010005.


Training drills in high performance badminton-effects of interval duration on internal and external loads.

Edel A, Weis J, Ferrauti A, Wiewelhove T Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1189688.

PMID: 37457032 PMC: 10348806. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1189688.


A Binary-Entropy Analysis of the Relationship Between Scoring Structure and Match Outcome in Badminton.

Wang C Front Psychol. 2022; 13:799293.

PMID: 35350729 PMC: 8957963. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.799293.


The Influence of Technical and Contextual Variables of the Last Stroke on Point Outcome in Men's and Women's Singles Badminton.

Sheng Y, Yi Q, Gomez-Ruano M, Chen P Front Psychol. 2022; 12:802179.

PMID: 35082730 PMC: 8784413. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802179.


References
1.
Cabello Manrique D, Gonzalez-Badillo J . Analysis of the characteristics of competitive badminton. Br J Sports Med. 2003; 37(1):62-6. PMC: 1724585. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.62. View

2.
Di X, Zhu S, Jin H, Wang P, Ye Z, Zhou K . Altered resting brain function and structure in professional badminton players. Brain Connect. 2012; 2(4):225-33. PMC: 3621728. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2011.0050. View

3.
Ortega E, Villarejo D, Palao J . Differences in game statistics between winning and losing rugby teams in the six nations tournament. J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 8(4):523-7. PMC: 3761549. View

4.
Phomsoupha M, Laffaye G . The science of badminton: game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Sports Med. 2015; 45(4):473-95. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0287-2. View

5.
Laffaye G, Phomsoupha M, Dor F . Changes in the Game Characteristics of a Badminton Match: A Longitudinal Study through the Olympic Game Finals Analysis in Men's Singles. J Sports Sci Med. 2015; 14(3):584-90. PMC: 4541123. View