» Articles » PMID: 30997136

Reducing Delay in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Other Time-critical Conditions: a Systematic Review to Identify the Behaviour Change Techniques Associated with Effective Interventions

Overview
Journal Open Heart
Date 2019 Apr 19
PMID 30997136
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Time to treatment in many conditions, particularly acute coronary syndrome, is critical to reducing mortality. Delay between onset of symptoms and treatment remains a worldwide problem. Reducing patient delay has been particularly challenging. Embedding behaviour change techniques (BCTs) within interventions might lead to shorter delay.

Objective: To identify which BCTs are associated with reductions in patient delay among people with symptoms or conditions where time to treatment is critical.

Methods: The data sources were Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycINFO. Study eligibility criteria include intervention evaluations (randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and cohort studies) involving adults (aged >18 years) and including an outcome measure of patient delay up to August 2016. Study appraisal and synthesis methods include screening potential studies using a transparent, replicable process. Study characteristics, outcomes and BCTs were extracted from eligible studies.

Results: From 39 studies (200 538 participants), just over half (n=20) reported a significant reduction in delay. 19 BCTs were identified, plus 5 additional techniques, with a mean of 2 (SD=2.3) BCTs and 2 (SD=0.7) per intervention. No clear pattern between BCTs and effectiveness was found. In studies examining patient delay specifically, three of four studies that included two or more BCTs, in addition to the two most commonly used additional techniques, reported a significant reduction in delay.

Conclusions: Around half of the interventions to reduce prehospital delay with time-critical symptoms report a significant reduction in delay time. It is not clear what differentiates effective from non-effective interventions, although in relation to patient delay particularly additional use of BCTs might be helpful.

Trial Registration Number: CRD42014013106.

Citing Articles

Door-to-device time and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insight from real world data of Thai PCI Registry.

Champasri K, Srimahachota S, Chandavimol M, Udayachalerm W, Thakkinstian A, Sookananchai B Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023; 13(5):843-854.

PMID: 37941842 PMC: 10628423. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-22-611.


Editorial: Surgical outcomes in acute care surgery: should we introduce the concept of time-critical condition?.

Fransvea P, La Greca A, Giovinazzo F, Costa G, Sganga G Front Surg. 2023; 10:1234200.

PMID: 37564116 PMC: 10411342. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1234200.


Integrating multimodal information in machine learning for classifying acute myocardial infarction.

Xiao R, Ding C, Hu X, Clifford G, Wright D, Shah A Physiol Meas. 2023; 44(4).

PMID: 36963114 PMC: 10111877. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/acc77f.


Reducing patient delay in acute coronary syndrome: Randomized controlled trial testing effect of behaviour change intervention on intentions to seek help.

Farquharson B, Johnston M, Williams B, Smith K, Dombrowski S, Jones C Br J Health Psychol. 2022; 28(1):188-207.

PMID: 35942523 PMC: 10086951. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12619.


Rural patients' experience of education, surveillance, and self-care support after heart disease related hospitalisation: a qualitative study.

Johannsdottir T, Ingadottir B, Svavarsdottir M Int J Circumpolar Health. 2021; 80(1):2007667.

PMID: 34839809 PMC: 8635654. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2021.2007667.


References
1.
Unal B, Critchley J, Capewell S . Explaining the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in England and Wales between 1981 and 2000. Circulation. 2004; 109(9):1101-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118498.35499.B2. View

2.
Bett J, Tonkin A, Thompson P, Aroney C . Failure of current public educational campaigns to impact on the initial response of patients with possible heart attack. Intern Med J. 2005; 35(5):279-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00798.x. View

3.
Muller-Nordhorn J, Wegscheider K, Nolte C, Jungehulsing G, Rossnagel K, Reich A . Population-based intervention to reduce prehospital delays in patients with cerebrovascular events. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(16):1484-90. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.232. View

4.
Smith S, Fielding S, Murchie P, Johnston M, Wyke S, Powell R . Reducing the time before consulting with symptoms of lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(606):e47-54. PMC: 3529292. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X660779. View

5.
OConnor R, Brady W, Brooks S, Diercks D, Egan J, Ghaemmaghami C . Part 10: acute coronary syndromes: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S787-817. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971028. View