» Articles » PMID: 30992054

Heterogeneity of Regional Inflection Points from Pressure-volume Curves Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2019 Apr 18
PMID 30992054
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The pressure-volume (P-V) curve has been suggested as a bedside tool to set mechanical ventilation; however, it reflects a global behavior of the lung without giving information on the regional mechanical properties. Regional P-V (PVr) curves derived from electrical impedance tomography (EIT) could provide valuable clinical information at bedside, being able to explore the regional mechanics of the lung. In the present study, we hypothesized that regional P-V curves would provide different information from those obtained from global P-V curves, both in terms of upper and lower inflection points. Therefore, we constructed pressure-volume curves for each pixel row from non-dependent to dependent lung regions of patients affected by acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Methods: We analyzed slow-inflation P-V maneuvers data from 12 mechanically ventilated patients. During the inflation, the pneumotachograph was used to record flow and airway pressure while the EIT signals were recorded digitally. From each maneuver, global respiratory system P-V curve (PVg) and PVr curves were obtained, each one corresponding to a pixel row within the EIT image. PVg and PVr curves were fitted using a sigmoidal equation, and the upper (UIP) and lower (LIP) inflection points for each curve were mathematically identified; LIP and UIP from PVg were respectively called LIPg and UIPg. From each measurement, the highest regional LIP (LIPr) and the lowest regional UIP (UIPr) were identified and the pressure difference between those two points was defined as linear driving pressure (ΔP).

Results: A significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between LIPr (15.8 [9.2-21.1] cmHO) and LIPg (2.9 [2.2-8.9] cmHO); in all measurements, the LIPr was higher than the corresponding LIPg. We found a significant difference (p < 0.005) between UIPr (30.1 [23.5-37.6] cmHO) and UIPg (40.5 [34.2-45] cmHO), the UIPr always being lower than the corresponding UIPg. Median ΔP was 12.6 [7.4-20.8] cmHO and in 56% of cases was < 14 cmHO.

Conclusions: Regional inflection points derived by EIT show high variability reflecting lung heterogeneity. Regional P-V curves obtained by EIT could convey more sensitive information than global lung mechanics on the pressures within which all lung regions express linear compliance.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02907840 . Registered on 20 September 2016.

Citing Articles

Distribution of airway pressure opening in the lungs measured with electrical impedance tomography (POET): a prospective physiological study.

Sun N, Brault C, Rodrigues A, Ko M, Vieira F, Phoophiboon V Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):28.

PMID: 39819779 PMC: 11740639. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05264-3.


Electrical impedance tomography monitoring in adult ICU patients: state-of-the-art, recommendations for standardized acquisition, processing, and clinical use, and future directions.

Scaramuzzo G, Pavlovsky B, Adler A, Baccinelli W, Bodor D, Damiani L Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):377.

PMID: 39563476 PMC: 11577873. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05173-x.


Inter-lung asymmetrical airway closure cause insufflation delay between lungs in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Roze H, Bonnardel E, Gallo E, Boisselier C, Khan P, Perrier V Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1):162.

PMID: 39441425 PMC: 11499510. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01379-y.


Decades Under the Influence: Shifting the PEEP Paradigm in ARDS.

Ring B Respir Care. 2024; 69(10):1347-1350.

PMID: 39327024 PMC: 11469003. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.12435.


Effects of individualised lung-protective ventilation with lung dynamic compliance-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration on postoperative pulmonary complications of paediatric video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: protocol for a....

Chen J, Lin R, Shi X, Liang C, Hu W, Ma X BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024; 8(1).

PMID: 39019541 PMC: 11253728. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002359.


References
1.
Roupie E, DAmbrosio M, Servillo G, Mentec H, El Atrous S, Beydon L . Titration of tidal volume and induced hypercapnia in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995; 152(1):121-8. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.1.7599810. View

2.
Amato M, Barbas C, Medeiros D, Magaldi R, Schettino G, Lorenzi-Filho G . Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338(6):347-54. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602. View

3.
Taccone F, Malfertheiner M, Ferrari F, Di Nardo M, Swol J, Broman L . Extracorporeal CO2 removal in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017; 83(7):762-772. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11835-3. View

4.
Venegas J, Harris R, Simon B . A comprehensive equation for the pulmonary pressure-volume curve. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998; 84(1):389-95. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.1.389. View

5.
Bellani G, Laffey J, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A . Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016; 315(8):788-800. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. View