» Articles » PMID: 30987991

Visual Impairment and Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in US Adolescents and Adults: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Apr 17
PMID 30987991
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare levels of physical activity and sedentary time in a representative sample of US adolescents and adults with and without visual impairment.

Design: Cross-sectional analyses were carried out using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Participants: The study population consisted of 6001 participants (adolescents n=1766, adults n=4235). The present analysis aggregated data from 2003 to 2004 and 2005-2006.

Measures: Objective physical activity and sedentary behaviour assessment was conducted over 7 days. Distance visual acuity was measured for each eye in all participants 12 years and older. Participants' vision was categorised as: normal vision, uncorrected refractive error, non-refractive visual impairment. We estimated the sex-specific linear associations between presenting vision and objectively measured physical activity and sedentary patterns using adjusted generalised linear models in adolescents and adults.

Results And Conclusions: Adolescents with uncorrected refractive error and non-refractive visual impairment did not accumulate higher levels of sedentary time or lower levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) compared with those with normal vision. We observed no association between vision status and accelerometer measured MVPA in adults aged 20-49 years. We observed more time spent sedentary among females 20-49 years old with non-refractive visual impairment compared with those presenting normal vision (mean difference 329.8 min/week, 95% CI: 12.5 to 647.0). Adults 50 years and older with non-refractive visual impairment appeared to accumulate less lifestyle physical activity, particularly in women (mean difference -82.8 min/week, 95% CI: -147.8 to -17.8). Adult women with non-refractive visual impairment have lower levels of lifestyle physical activity and higher levels of sedentary time than those with normal vision. Taken together, these findings highlight the need for interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary time in adult populations with visual impairment, specifically adult women.

Citing Articles

Association between dietary inflammatory index and visual impairment among adults in the NHANES 2005-2008.

Hu Y, Zheng J, He L, Hu J, Yang Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30668.

PMID: 39730384 PMC: 11681061. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75950-9.


Quantifying physical activity, physical education and active travel in children and adolescents with visual Impairments.

Flynn L, Millar K, Belton S, OConnor N, Meegan S, Britton U Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e34856.

PMID: 39170530 PMC: 11336355. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34856.


Differences in Objective Physical Activity Between Children With Visual Impairment and Those With Normal Sight.

Adhikari S, van Rens F, van Nispen R, Galna B, Elsman E, Poudel M Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(7):18.

PMID: 39052253 PMC: 11282890. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.7.18.


Impact of Physical Activity Frequency, Duration, and Intensity on Senile Cataract Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Mi Y, Zhu Q, Chen Y, Zheng X, Wan M, Li Y Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(5):26.

PMID: 38814746 PMC: 11146084. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.5.26.


The association of subjective vision with objectively measured intensity-specific physical activity and bout-specific sedentary behavior among community-dwelling older adults in Japan.

Isamu K, Takamiya T, Amagasa S, Machida M, Kikuchi H, Fukushima N Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023; 67(2):164-174.

PMID: 36708419 DOI: 10.1007/s10384-023-00977-w.


References
1.
Vitale S, Cotch M, Sperduto R . Prevalence of visual impairment in the United States. JAMA. 2006; 295(18):2158-63. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.18.2158. View

2.
Phoenix C, Griffin M, Smith B . Physical activity among older people with sight loss: a qualitative research study to inform policy and practice. Public Health. 2015; 129(2):124-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.10.001. View

3.
Melanson Jr E, Freedson P . Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995; 27(6):934-40. View

4.
Crouter S, DellaValle D, Haas J, Frongillo E, Bassett D . Validity of ActiGraph 2-regression model, Matthews cut-points, and NHANES cut-points for assessing free-living physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2012; 10(4):504-14. PMC: 4199088. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.10.4.504. View

5.
Anokye N, Trueman P, Green C, Pavey T, Taylor R . Physical activity and health related quality of life. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:624. PMC: 3490805. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-624. View