» Articles » PMID: 30985616

Estimating Occupational Heat Exposure From Personal Sampling of Public Works Employees in Birmingham, Alabama

Overview
Date 2019 Apr 16
PMID 30985616
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study investigated whether using thermometers clipped on workers' shoes would result in different heat exposure estimation and work-rest schedules compared with using area-level meteorological data alone.

Methods: Alabama workers (n = 51) were individually monitored using thermometers on shoes. Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) was estimated using thermometer temperatures (WBGT [personal]) or nearby weather station temperatures (WBGT [WS]). Work-rest schedules were determined from WBGT, clothing, and hourly metabolic rates estimated from self-reported tasks and bodyweight.

Results: The percent of hours exceeding the threshold limit value (TLV, ACGIH, Cincinnati, OH) were estimated at 47.8% using WBGT (personal) versus 42.1% using WBGT (WS). For work-rest recommendations, more hours fell into the most protective schedule (0 to 15 min work/45 to 60 min rest) using WBGT (personal) versus WBGT (WS) (17.4% vs 14.4%).

Conclusions: Temperatures from wearable thermometers, together with meteorological data, can serve as an additional method to identify occupational heat stress exposure and recommend work-rest schedules.

Citing Articles

Mixed methods assessment of personal heat exposure, sleep, physical activity, and heat adaptation strategies among urban residents in the Boston area, MA.

Milando C, Black-Ingersoll F, Heidari L, Lopez-Hernandez I, de Lange J, Negassa A BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):2314.

PMID: 36496371 PMC: 9739346. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14692-7.


Wearables for Measuring Health Effects of Climate Change-Induced Weather Extremes: Scoping Review.

Koch M, Matzke I, Huhn S, Gunga H, Maggioni M, Munga S JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022; 10(9):e39532.

PMID: 36083624 PMC: 9508665. DOI: 10.2196/39532.


A community-engaged approach to understanding environmental health concerns and solutions in urban and rural communities.

Wang S, Richardson M, Evans M, Johnson E, Threadgill-Matthews S, Tyson S BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1738.

PMID: 34560866 PMC: 8464125. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11799-1.


Wearable Devices for Environmental Monitoring in the Built Environment: A Systematic Review.

Salamone F, Masullo M, Sibilio S Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(14).

PMID: 34300467 PMC: 8309593. DOI: 10.3390/s21144727.


Occupational heat exposure and the risk of chronic kidney disease of nontraditional origin in the United States.

Chapman C, Hess H, Lucas R, Glaser J, Saran R, Bragg-Gresham J Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2021; 321(2):R141-R151.

PMID: 34161738 PMC: 8409908. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00103.2021.


References
1.
Bernard T, Pourmoghani M . Prediction of workplace wet bulb global temperature. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1999; 14(2):126-34. DOI: 10.1080/104732299303296. View

2.
Bernard T, Luecke C, Schwartz S, Kirkland K, Ashley C . WBGT clothing adjustments for four clothing ensembles under three relative humidity levels. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005; 2(5):251-6. DOI: 10.1080/15459620590934224. View

3.
Liljegren J, Carhart R, Lawday P, Tschopp S, Sharp R . Modeling the wet bulb globe temperature using standard meteorological measurements. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008; 5(10):645-55. DOI: 10.1080/15459620802310770. View

4.
Bernard T, Ashley C . Short-term heat stress exposure limits based on wet bulb globe temperature adjusted for clothing and metabolic rate. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009; 6(10):632-8. DOI: 10.1080/15459620903133642. View

5.
Holmer I . Climate change and occupational heat stress: methods for assessment. Glob Health Action. 2010; 3. PMC: 2997731. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v3i0.5719. View