» Articles » PMID: 30980343

Feature-based Guidance of Attention During Post-saccadic Selection

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2019 Apr 14
PMID 30980343
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current models of trans-saccadic perception propose that, after a saccade, the saccade target object must be localized among objects near the landing position. However, the nature of the attentional mechanisms supporting this process is currently under debate. In the present study, we tested whether surface properties of the saccade target object automatically bias post-saccadic selection using a variant of the visual search task. Participants executed a saccade to a shape-singleton target in a circular array. During this primary saccade, the array sometimes rotated so that the eyes landed between the target and an adjacent distractor, requiring gaze correction. In addition, each object in the array had an incidental color value. On Switch trials, the target and adjacent distractor switched colors. The accuracy and latency of gaze correction to the target (measures that provide a direct index of target localization) were compared with a control condition in which no color switch occurred (No-switch trials). Gaze correction to the target was substantially impaired in the Switch condition. This result was obtained even when participants had substantial incentive to avoid encoding the color of the saccade target. In addition, similar effects were observed when the roles of the two feature dimensions (color and shape) were reversed. The results indicate that saccade target features are automatically encoded before a saccade, are retained in visual working memory across the saccade, and instantiate a feature-based selection operation when the eyes land, biasing attention toward objects that match target features.

Citing Articles

Post-saccadic changes disrupt attended pre-saccadic object memory.

Laurin A, Bleau M, Gedjakouchian J, Fournet R, Pisella L, Khan A J Vis. 2021; 21(8):8.

PMID: 34347017 PMC: 8340665. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.8.8.


Transsaccadic integration relies on a limited memory resource.

Kong G, Kroell L, Schneegans S, Aagten-Murphy D, Bays P J Vis. 2021; 21(5):24.

PMID: 34019621 PMC: 8142717. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.5.24.


Visual working memory content influences correspondence processes.

Hein E, Stepper M, Hollingworth A, Moore C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021; 47(3):331-343.

PMID: 33507771 PMC: 9073926. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000890.


Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.

Foerster R, Schneider W Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020; 82(5):2379-2392.

PMID: 32166644 PMC: 7343749. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02007-0.

References
1.
Hoffman J, Subramaniam B . The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys. 1995; 57(6):787-95. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206794. View

2.
Demeyer M, De Graef P, Wagemans J, Verfaillie K . Object form discontinuity facilitates displacement discrimination across saccades. J Vis. 2010; 10(6):17. DOI: 10.1167/10.6.17. View

3.
Deubel H, Schneider W, Bridgeman B . Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement. Vision Res. 1996; 36(7):985-96. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00203-0. View

4.
Shen M, Tang N, Wu F, Shui R, Gao Z . Robust object-based encoding in visual working memory. J Vis. 2013; 13(2):1. DOI: 10.1167/13.2.1. View

5.
Gao T, Gao Z, Li J, Sun Z, Shen M . The perceptual root of object-based storage: an interactive model of perception and visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011; 37(6):1803-23. DOI: 10.1037/a0025637. View