» Articles » PMID: 30978980

Fear Level Classification Based on Emotional Dimensions and Machine Learning Techniques

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2019 Apr 14
PMID 30978980
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been steady progress in the field of affective computing over the last two decades that has integrated artificial intelligence techniques in the construction of computational models of emotion. Having, as a purpose, the development of a system for treating phobias that would automatically determine fear levels and adapt exposure intensity based on the user's current affective state, we propose a comparative study between various machine and deep learning techniques (four deep neural network models, a stochastic configuration network, Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Random Forest and k-Nearest Neighbors), with and without feature selection, for recognizing and classifying fear levels based on the electroencephalogram (EEG) and peripheral data from the DEAP (Database for Emotion Analysis using Physiological signals) database. Fear was considered an emotion eliciting low valence, high arousal and low dominance. By dividing the ratings of valence/arousal/dominance emotion dimensions, we propose two paradigms for fear level estimation-the two-level (0- and 1-) and the four-level (0-, 1-, 2-, 3-) paradigms. Although all the methods provide good classification accuracies, the highest F scores have been obtained using the Random Forest Classifier-89.96% and 85.33% for the two-level and four-level fear evaluation modality.

Citing Articles

The healing power of L.: how flower types influence urban residents' physiological and psychological wellbeing.

Ai L, Wang H, Feng Y, Li T, Li Z, Zou M Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1489859.

PMID: 40078438 PMC: 11897270. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1489859.


Emotional salience network involved in constructing two-dimensional fear space in humans.

Lyu J, Li J, Ding R, Zhao H, Liu C, Qin S Neurobiol Stress. 2024; 34:100677.

PMID: 39649148 PMC: 11621499. DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100677.


Strategies for Reliable Stress Recognition: A Machine Learning Approach Using Heart Rate Variability Features.

Bahameish M, Stockman T, Carrion J Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(10).

PMID: 38794064 PMC: 11126126. DOI: 10.3390/s24103210.


Investigation of different ML approaches in classification of emotions induced by acute stress.

Sourkatti H, Pettersson K, van der Sanden B, Lindholm M, Plomp J, Maattanen I Heliyon. 2024; 10(1):e23611.

PMID: 38173518 PMC: 10761802. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23611.


Multi-Input CNN-LSTM deep learning model for fear level classification based on EEG and peripheral physiological signals.

Masuda N, Yairi I Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1141801.

PMID: 37325747 PMC: 10267388. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1141801.


References
1.
Muller M, Keil A, Gruber T, Elbert T . Processing of affective pictures modulates right-hemispheric gamma band EEG activity. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 110(11):1913-20. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00151-0. View

2.
Wilensky A, Schafe G, LeDoux J . The amygdala modulates memory consolidation of fear-motivated inhibitory avoidance learning but not classical fear conditioning. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(18):7059-66. PMC: 6772812. View

3.
Aftanas L, Golocheikine S . Human anterior and frontal midline theta and lower alpha reflect emotionally positive state and internalized attention: high-resolution EEG investigation of meditation. Neurosci Lett. 2001; 310(1):57-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02094-8. View

4.
Aftanas L, Varlamov A, Pavlov S, Makhnev V, Reva N . Time-dependent cortical asymmetries induced by emotional arousal: EEG analysis of event-related synchronization and desynchronization in individually defined frequency bands. Int J Psychophysiol. 2002; 44(1):67-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(01)00194-5. View

5.
Davidson R . Anterior cerebral asymmetry and the nature of emotion. Brain Cogn. 1992; 20(1):125-51. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(92)90065-t. View