» Articles » PMID: 30976933

Inhibitory Control and Memory in the Search Process for a Modified Problem in Grey Squirrels, Sciurus Carolinensis

Overview
Journal Anim Cogn
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Apr 13
PMID 30976933
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Inhibiting learned behaviours when they become unproductive and searching for an alternative solution to solve a familiar but different problem are two indicators of flexibility in problem solving. A wide range of animals show these tendencies spontaneously, but what kind of search process is at play behind their problem-solving success? Here, we investigated how Eastern grey squirrels, Sciurus carolinensis, solved a modified mechanical problem that required them to abandon their preferred and learned solution and search for alternative solutions to retrieve out-of-reach food rewards. Squirrels could solve the problem by engaging in either an exhaustive search (i.e., using trial-and-error to access the reward) or a 'backup' solution search (i.e., recalling a previously successful but non-preferred solution). We found that all squirrels successfully solved the modified problem on their first trial and showed solving durations comparable to their last experience of using their preferred solution. Their success and high efficiency could be explained by their high level of inhibitory control as the squirrels did not persistently emit the learned and preferred, but now ineffective, pushing behaviour. Although the squirrels had minimal experience in using the alternative (non-preferred) successful solution, they used it directly or after one or two failed attempts to achieve success. Thus, the squirrels were using the 'backup' solution search process. Such a process is likely a form of generalisation which involves retrieving related information of an experienced problem and applying previous successful experience during problem solving. Overall, our results provide information regarding the search process underlying the flexibility observable in problem-solving success.

Citing Articles

Frontoparietal connectivity as a product of convergent evolution in rodents and primates: functional connectivity topologies in grey squirrels, rats, and marmosets.

Schaeffer D, Gilbert K, Bellyou M, Silva A, Everling S Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):986.

PMID: 36115876 PMC: 9482620. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03949-x.


Can Habits Impede Creativity by Inducing Fixation?.

Ibanez de Aldecoa P, de Wit S, Tebbich S Front Psychol. 2021; 12:683024.

PMID: 34721137 PMC: 8548374. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683024.


Behavioral flexibility: A review, a model, and some exploratory tests.

Lea S, Chow P, Leaver L, McLaren I Learn Behav. 2020; 48(1):173-187.

PMID: 32043268 PMC: 7082303. DOI: 10.3758/s13420-020-00421-w.

References
1.
Canas J, Quesada J, Antoli A, Fajardo I . Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics. 2003; 46(5):482-501. DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000061640. View

2.
Emery N, Clayton N . The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science. 2004; 306(5703):1903-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1098410. View

3.
Mulcahy N, Call J . How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task. Anim Cogn. 2006; 9(3):193-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0019-6. View

4.
Bilalic M, McLeod P, Gobet F . Inflexibility of experts--reality or myth? Quantifying the Einstellung effect in chess masters. Cogn Psychol. 2007; 56(2):73-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.02.001. View

5.
Martin-Ordas G, Call J, Colmenares F . Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks. Anim Cogn. 2008; 11(3):423-30. PMC: 2757606. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0132-1. View