» Articles » PMID: 30976322

Less Biomass and Intracellular Glutamate in Anodic Biofilms Lead to Efficient Electricity Generation by Microbial Fuel Cells

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2019 Apr 13
PMID 30976322
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Using a microbial fuel cell (MFC), we observed that a complex microbial community decomposed starch and transferred electrons to a graphite felt anode to generate current. In spite of the same reactor configuration, inoculum, substrate, temperature, and pH, MFCs produced different current and power density. To understand which factor(s) affected electricity generation, here, we analyzed a complex microbial community in an anodic biofilm and fermentation broth using Illumina MiSeq sequencing and metabolomics.

Results: Microbial biomass on the anode was lower in MFCs generating more electricity (0.09-0.16 mg cm-anode) than in those generating less electricity (0.60-2.80 mg cm-anode), while being equal (3890-4196 mg L-broth) in the fermentation broth over the same operational period. Chemical oxygen demand removal and acetate concentration were also similar in fermentation broths. MFCs generating more electricity had relatively more exoelectrogenic bacteria, such as sp., but fewer acetate-utilizing sp. and/or sp. in anodic biofilms. Accordingly, anodic biofilms generating more electricity presented higher levels of most intracellular metabolites related to the tricarboxylic acid cycle and a higher intracellular ATP/ADP ratio, but a lower intracellular NADH/NAD ratio. Moreover, the level of intracellular glutamate, an essential metabolite for microbial anabolic reactions, correlated negatively with current density.

Conclusion: Microbial growth on the anode and intracellular glutamate levels negatively affect electricity generation by MFCs. Reduced formation of anodic biofilm, in which intracellular glutamate concentration is 33.9 μmol g-cell or less, favors the growth of acetate-utilizing sp. on the anode and improves current generation.

Citing Articles

Optimization of soil microbial fuel cell for sustainable bio-electricity production: combined effects of electrode material, electrode spacing, and substrate feeding frequency on power generation and microbial community diversity.

Simeon I, Weig A, Freitag R Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022; 15(1):124.

PMID: 36380346 PMC: 9667596. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-022-02224-9.


Investigation of Polymer Biofilm Formation on Titanium-Based Anode Surface in Microbial Fuel Cells with Poplar Substrate.

Erensoy A, Cek N Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(11).

PMID: 34205984 PMC: 8198351. DOI: 10.3390/polym13111833.


Rhamnolipids and surfactin inhibit the growth or formation of oral bacterial biofilm.

Yamasaki R, Kawano A, Yoshioka Y, Ariyoshi W BMC Microbiol. 2020; 20(1):358.

PMID: 33228524 PMC: 7684882. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-02034-9.


In vitro human colonic microbiota utilises D-β-hydroxybutyrate to increase butyrogenesis.

Sasaki K, Sasaki D, Hannya A, Tsubota J, Kondo A Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):8516.

PMID: 32444846 PMC: 7244492. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65561-5.

References
1.
Hols P, Ramos A, Hugenholtz J, Delcour J, de Vos W, Santos H . Acetate utilization in Lactococcus lactis deficient in lactate dehydrogenase: a rescue pathway for maintaining redox balance. J Bacteriol. 1999; 181(17):5521-6. PMC: 94066. DOI: 10.1128/JB.181.17.5521-5526.1999. View

2.
Reitzer L . Nitrogen assimilation and global regulation in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003; 57:155-76. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090820. View

3.
Mahadevan R, Bond D, Butler J, Esteve-Nunez A, Coppi M, Palsson B . Characterization of metabolism in the Fe(III)-reducing organism Geobacter sulfurreducens by constraint-based modeling. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(2):1558-68. PMC: 1392927. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1558-1568.2006. View

4.
Lovley D . Microbial fuel cells: novel microbial physiologies and engineering approaches. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006; 17(3):327-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.04.006. View

5.
Lovley D . Bug juice: harvesting electricity with microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006; 4(7):497-508. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1442. View