» Articles » PMID: 30972939

Testing the Ability of Unmanned Aerial Systems and Machine Learning to Map Weeds at Subfield Scales: a Test with the Weed Alopecurus Myosuroides (Huds)

Overview
Journal Pest Manag Sci
Specialties Biology
Toxicology
Date 2019 Apr 12
PMID 30972939
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It is important to map agricultural weed populations to improve management and maintain future food security. Advances in data collection and statistical methodology have created new opportunities to aid in the mapping of weed populations. We set out to apply these new methodologies (unmanned aerial systems; UAS) and statistical techniques (convolutional neural networks; CNN) to the mapping of black-grass, a highly impactful weed in wheat fields in the UK. We tested this by undertaking extensive UAS and field-based mapping over the course of 2 years, in total collecting multispectral image data from 102 fields, with 76 providing informative data. We used these data to construct a vegetation index (VI), which we used to train a custom CNN model from scratch. We undertook a suite of data engineering techniques, such as balancing and cleaning to optimize performance of our metrics. We also investigate the transferability of the models from one field to another.

Results: The results show that our data collection methodology and implementation of CNN outperform pervious approaches in the literature. We show that data engineering to account for 'artefacts' in the image data increases our metrics significantly. We are not able to identify any traits that are shared between fields that result in high scores from our novel leave one field our cross validation (LOFO-CV) tests.

Conclusion: We conclude that this evaluation procedure is a better estimation of real-world predictive value when compared with past studies. We conclude that by engineering the image data set into discrete classes of data quality we increase the prediction accuracy from the baseline model by 5% to an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.825. We find that the temporal effects studied here have no effect on our ability to model weed densities. © 2019 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Citing Articles

Research on weed identification method in rice fields based on UAV remote sensing.

Yu F, Jin Z, Guo S, Guo Z, Zhang H, Xu T Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:1037760.

PMID: 36438154 PMC: 9681826. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1037760.


Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Updated Review.

Benos L, Tagarakis A, Dolias G, Berruto R, Kateris D, Bochtis D Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(11).

PMID: 34071553 PMC: 8198852. DOI: 10.3390/s21113758.

References
1.
Rondinini C, Wilson K, Boitani L, Grantham H, Possingham H . Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9(10):1136-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00970.x. View

2.
Carter J, Pan J, Rai S, Galandiuk S . ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves. Surgery. 2016; 159(6):1638-1645. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.029. View

3.
Xiao D, Tao F, Liu Y, Shi W, Wang M, Liu F . Observed changes in winter wheat phenology in the North China Plain for 1981-2009. Int J Biometeorol. 2012; 57(2):275-85. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-012-0552-8. View

4.
Pena J, Torres-Sanchez J, Serrano-Perez A, de Castro A, Lopez-Granados F . Quantifying efficacy and limits of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology for weed seedling detection as affected by sensor resolution. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(3):5609-26. PMC: 4435221. DOI: 10.3390/s150305609. View

5.
Shin H, Roth H, Gao M, Lu L, Xu Z, Nogues I . Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016; 35(5):1285-98. PMC: 4890616. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2528162. View