» Articles » PMID: 30972011

Glial Activation Markers in CSF and Serum From Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Potential of Serum GFAP As Disease Severity Marker?

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Apr 12
PMID 30972011
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), glial activation is thought to be a relevant mechanism of disability progression. Therefore, assessment of the glial cell activity is, in the emerging treatment era of primary progressive MS (PPMS), more important than ever. To test the association of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum markers of glial activation in PPMS patients; including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1), soluble variant of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), and marker of neuroaxonal damage (Neurofilament light chain, NfL) as well as clinical severity. CSF and serum samples from PPMS patients were collected in the MS-centers at Universities of Freiburg ( = 49), Ulm ( = 27), Muenster ( = 11), and Rostock ( = 6). sTREM2 and CHI3L1 levels were measured using the previously reported ELISA assays, while NfL and GFAP were measured using SIMOA assays. Clinical data included age, gender, disease duration, treatment status, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). 93 CSF samples and 71 matching serum samples were analyzed. The median age of patients was 49 years and disease duration 4.5 years. GFAP correlated with EDSS after correction for age (β = 0.3, = 0.001). Furthermore, EDSS was higher in patients with a GFAP level ≥ 151.7 pg/ml compared to patients with GFAP below this cut-off (5.5 vs. 4.0, = 0.009). Other markers did not correlate with the clinical severity. Moreover, we found a correlation between NfL and GFAP, sTREM2 and CHI3L1 (ρ = 0.4 for GFAP and sTREM2, ρ = 0.3 for CHI3L1, < 0.01 for sTREM2 and CHI3L1 and <0.001 for GFAP). CHI3L1 did not correlate with GFAP but with sTREM2 (ρ = 0.4, < 0.01). The correlation between the glial activation markers in CSF with the markers of neuroaxonal demise supports the notion of the glial involvement in PPMS. The positive correlation between GFAP with disease duration and GFAP with the clinical severity of the disease may highlight a particular role of the astrocytes in PPMS and mark the potential of GFAP as a disease severity marker.

Citing Articles

Clinical biomarkers of perioperative neurocognitive disorder: initiation and recommendation.

Liu J, Li C, Yao J, Zhang L, Zhao X, Lv X Sci China Life Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 39918707 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-024-2797-x.


Multifaceted Biomarkers Suggest a Similar Profile of CNS Pathology in Relapsing and Progressive MS.

Blok K, Klein Kranenbarg R, Ananth K, Engelenburg H, van den Bosch A, Giannini L Eur J Neurol. 2025; 32(2):e70052.

PMID: 39907163 PMC: 11795420. DOI: 10.1111/ene.70052.


A framework of biomarkers for brain aging: a consensus statement by the Aging Biomarker Consortium.

Jia Y, Wang J, Ren J, Chan P, Chen S, Chen X Life Med. 2025; 2(3):lnad017.

PMID: 39872296 PMC: 11749242. DOI: 10.1093/lifemedi/lnad017.


CHI3L1 in Multiple Sclerosis-From Bench to Clinic.

Jatczak-Pawlik I, Jurewicz A, Domowicz M, Ewiak-Paszynska A, Stasiolek M Cells. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768177 PMC: 11674340. DOI: 10.3390/cells13242086.


Tyro3 and Gas6 are associated with white matter and myelin integrity in multiple sclerosis.

Rosenstein I, Novakova L, Kvartsberg H, Nordin A, Rasch S, Rembeza E J Neuroinflammation. 2024; 21(1):320.

PMID: 39673059 PMC: 11645787. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-024-03315-0.


References
1.
Petzold A, Eikelenboom M, Gveric D, Keir G, Chapman M, Lazeron R . Markers for different glial cell responses in multiple sclerosis: clinical and pathological correlations. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 7):1462-73. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf165. View

2.
Holley J, Gveric D, Newcombe J, Cuzner M, Gutowski N . Astrocyte characterization in the multiple sclerosis glial scar. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2003; 29(5):434-44. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00491.x. View

3.
Malmestrom C, Haghighi S, Rosengren L, Andersen O, Lycke J . Neurofilament light protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein as biological markers in MS. Neurology. 2003; 61(12):1720-5. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000098880.19793.b6. View

4.
Neumann H, Kotter M, Franklin R . Debris clearance by microglia: an essential link between degeneration and regeneration. Brain. 2008; 132(Pt 2):288-95. PMC: 2640215. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn109. View

5.
Tumani H, Teunissen C, Sussmuth S, Otto M, Ludolph A, Brettschneider J . Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration in chronic neurological diseases. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2008; 8(4):479-94. DOI: 10.1586/14737159.8.4.479. View