» Articles » PMID: 30971831

Metformin Prevention of Doxorubicin Resistance in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 Involves Oxidative Stress Generation and Modulation of Cell Adaptation Genes

Abstract

Metformin was shown to sensitize multidrug resistant breast cancer cells; however, the mechanisms involved in this capacity need to be clarified. We investigated oxidative stress and inflammatory-related pathways during the induction of doxorubicin resistance in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells (DOX-res group), and evaluated metformin-induced cellular responses that resulted in the prevention of doxorubicin resistance (Met-DOX group). Microarray analysis demonstrated that DOX-res changed the expression of genes involved in oxidative stress (OS) and the TGF- β1 pathway. The DOX-res group presented increased thiols and reduced lipoperoxidation, increased levels of nitric oxide, nuclear NF-kB and Nrf2, and reduced nuclear p53 labelling. Analysis of the TGF-β1 signaling pathway by RT-PCR array showed that DOX-res developed adaptive responses, such as resistance against apoptosis and OS. Metformin treatment modified gene expression related to OS and the IFN-α signaling pathway. The Met-DOX group was more sensitive to DOX-induced OS, presented lower levels of nitric oxide, nuclear NF-kB and Nrf2, and increased nuclear p53. Analysis of the IFN-α signaling pathway showed that Met-DOX presented more sensitivity to apoptosis and OS. Our findings indicate that metformin is a promising tool in the prevention of chemoresistance in patients with breast cancer submitted to doxorubicin-based treatments.

Citing Articles

Curcumin-Etoposide Synergy: Unveiling the Molecular Mechanisms of Enhanced Apoptosis and Chemoresistance Attenuation in Breast Cancer.

Jaberian Asl B, Afarin R, Hatami M, Dehghani Madiseh A, Roshanazadeh M, Rashidi M Iran J Pharm Res. 2025; 23(1):e150978.

PMID: 39834345 PMC: 11742740. DOI: 10.5812/ijpr-150978.


cRGD-Peptide Modified Covalent Organic Frameworks for Precision Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Benyettou F, Khair M, Prakasam T, Varghese S, Matouk Z, Alkaabi M ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024; 16(42):56676-56695.

PMID: 39267454 PMC: 11503616. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c10812.


Acetylcytidine modification of DDX41 and ZNF746 by -acetyltransferase 10 contributes to chemoresistance of melanoma.

Wang L, Zeng Y, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Xu S, Liang Z Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1448890.

PMID: 39246323 PMC: 11377236. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1448890.


Changes in the Sensitivity of MCF-7 and MCF-7/DX Breast Cancer Cells to Cytostatic in the Presence of Metformin.

Plonka-Czerw J, Zyrek L, Latocha M Molecules. 2024; 29(15).

PMID: 39124936 PMC: 11313889. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29153531.


Carborane-Based ABCG2-Inhibitors Sensitize ABC-(Over)Expressing Cancer Cell Lines for Doxorubicin and Cisplatin.

Paskas S, Stockmann P, Mijatovic S, Kuhnert L, Honscha W, Hey-Hawkins E Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(11).

PMID: 38004447 PMC: 10674596. DOI: 10.3390/ph16111582.


References
1.
Pflaum J, Schlosser S, Muller M . p53 Family and Cellular Stress Responses in Cancer. Front Oncol. 2014; 4:285. PMC: 4204435. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00285. View

2.
Liu Z, Dai X, Du B . Hes1: a key role in stemness, metastasis and multidrug resistance. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015; 16(3):353-9. PMC: 4622741. DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2015.1016662. View

3.
Woo M, Xue K, Liu J, McBride H, Tsang B . Calpain-mediated processing of p53-associated parkin-like cytoplasmic protein (PARC) affects chemosensitivity of human ovarian cancer cells by promoting p53 subcellular trafficking. J Biol Chem. 2011; 287(6):3963-75. PMC: 3281727. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.314765. View

4.
Hobbs G, Zhou B, Cox A, Campbell S . Rho GTPases, oxidation, and cell redox control. Small GTPases. 2014; 5:e28579. PMC: 4114927. DOI: 10.4161/sgtp.28579. View

5.
Shi R, Peng H, Yuan X, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Fan D . Down-regulation of c-fos by shRNA sensitizes adriamycin-resistant MCF-7/ADR cells to chemotherapeutic agents via P-glycoprotein inhibition and apoptosis augmentation. J Cell Biochem. 2013; 114(8):1890-900. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.24533. View