» Articles » PMID: 30971391

The Effect of Neutral Recombination Variation on Genome Scans for Selection

Overview
Journal G3 (Bethesda)
Date 2019 Apr 12
PMID 30971391
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in identifying the role that regions of low recombination or inversion play in adaptation of species to local environments. Many examples of groups of adapted genes located within inversions are arising in the literature, in part inspired by theory that predicts the evolution of these so-called "supergenes." We still, however, have a poor understanding of how genomic heterogeneity, such as varying rates of recombination, may confound signals of selection. Here, I evaluate the effect of neutral inversions and recombination variation on genome scans for selection, including tests for selective sweeps, differentiation outlier tests, and association tests. There is considerable variation among methods in their performance, with some methods being unaffected and some showing elevated false positive signals within a neutral inversion or region of low recombination. In some cases the false positive signal can be dampened or removed, if it is possible to use a quasi-independent set of SNPs to parameterize the model before performing the test. These results will be helpful to those seeking to understand the importance of regions of low recombination in adaptation.

Citing Articles

Genetics in the Ocean's Twilight Zone: Population Structure of the Glacier Lanternfish Across Its Distribution Range.

Quintela M, Garcia-Seoane E, Dahle G, Klevjer T, Melle W, Lille-Langoy R Evol Appl. 2024; 17(11):e70032.

PMID: 39513049 PMC: 11540841. DOI: 10.1111/eva.70032.


Consequences of domestication in eastern oyster: Insights from whole genomic analyses.

Zhao H, Guo X, Wang W, Wang Z, Rawson P, Wilbur A Evol Appl. 2024; 17(6):e13710.

PMID: 38817396 PMC: 11134191. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13710.


Current status of community resources and priorities for weed genomics research.

Montgomery J, Morran S, MacGregor D, McElroy J, Neve P, Neto C Genome Biol. 2024; 25(1):139.

PMID: 38802856 PMC: 11129445. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03274-y.


Simulation Tests of Methods in Evolution, Ecology, and Systematics: Pitfalls, Progress, and Principles.

Lotterhos K, Fitzpatrick M, Blackmon H Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2023; 53(1):113-136.

PMID: 38107485 PMC: 10723108. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102320-093722.


Versatile Detection of Diverse Selective Sweeps with Flex-Sweep.

Lauterbur M, Munch K, Enard D Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(6).

PMID: 37307561 PMC: 10287538. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad139.


References
1.
Whitlock M, Lotterhos K . Reliable Detection of Loci Responsible for Local Adaptation: Inference of a Null Model through Trimming the Distribution of F(ST). Am Nat. 2015; 186 Suppl 1:S24-36. DOI: 10.1086/682949. View

2.
Charlesworth B . The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites. Genetics. 2012; 190(1):5-22. PMC: 3249359. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.134288. View

3.
Bradburd G, Coop G, Ralph P . Inferring Continuous and Discrete Population Genetic Structure Across Space. Genetics. 2018; 210(1):33-52. PMC: 6116973. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301333. View

4.
Guerrero R, Rousset F, Kirkpatrick M . Coalescent patterns for chromosomal inversions in divergent populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 367(1587):430-8. PMC: 3233714. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0246. View

5.
Kapun M, Fabian D, Goudet J, Flatt T . Genomic Evidence for Adaptive Inversion Clines in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 2016; 33(5):1317-36. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw016. View