» Articles » PMID: 30968285

Novel Method for Delayed Primary Closure and Incisional Hernia Prevention in Open Abdomen: COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal Wall Closure (COMODA)

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Apr 11
PMID 30968285
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intended open abdomen is an option in cases of trauma and non-trauma patients. Nevertheless, after primary closure, incisional hernia rate is high. We describe a novel method, called COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal closure (COMODA), a delayed primary closure which prevents incisional hernia.

Methods: A negative pressure wound therapy system is combined with a condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (cPTFE) mesh.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN72678033.

Results: Ten male patients with a median age of 68.8 (43-87) years were included. Primary closure rate was 100% per protocol. The median number of procedures per patient was 5.7 (5-9). Primary closure was obtained in 20.8 (10-32) days and median hospital stay was 36.3 (18-52) days. Only one patient developed incisional hernia during a median follow-up of 27 (8-60) months.

Conclusion: COMODA method allows for a high rate of delayed primary closure. It is safe and decreases the risk for developing an incisional hernia. However, a large number of patients are needed to support this conclusion.

Citing Articles

Early placement of a non-invasive, pressure-regulated, fascial reapproximation device improves reduction of the fascial gap in open abdomens: a retrospective cohort study.

Naveed A, Martin N, Bawazeer M, Jastaniah A, Rezende-Neto J Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024; 9(1):e001529.

PMID: 39411009 PMC: 11474681. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001529.


Intra-abdominal hypertension and compartment syndrome after complex hernia repair.

Van Hoef S, Dries P, Allaeys M, Eker H, Berrevoet F Hernia. 2024; 28(3):701-709.

PMID: 38568348 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02992-3.


Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients.

Cheng Y, Wang K, Gong J, Liu Z, Gong J, Zeng Z Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 5:CD013710.

PMID: 35514120 PMC: 9073087. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013710.pub2.


Dynamic closure techniques for treatment of an open abdomen: an update.

Poortmans N, Berrevoet F Hernia. 2020; 24(2):325-331.

PMID: 32020342 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02130-9.

References
1.
Tsuei B, Skinner J, Bernard A, Kearney P, Boulanger B . The open peritoneal cavity: etiology correlates with the likelihood of fascial closure. Am Surg. 2004; 70(7):652-6. View

2.
Jansen J, Loudon M . Damage control surgery in a non-trauma setting. Br J Surg. 2007; 94(7):789-90. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5922. View

3.
Kreis B, de Mol van Otterloo A, Kreis R . Open abdomen management: a review of its history and a proposed management algorithm. Med Sci Monit. 2013; 19:524-33. PMC: 3706408. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.883966. View

4.
Bruhin A, Ferreira F, Chariker M, Smith J, Runkel N . Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen. Int J Surg. 2014; 12(10):1105-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.396. View

5.
Perez D, Wildi S, Demartines N, Bramkamp M, Koehler C, Clavien P . Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205(4):586-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.015. View