» Articles » PMID: 30968216

Spatial Scaling in Multiscale Models: Methods for Coupling Agent-based and Finite-element Models of Wound Healing

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Apr 11
PMID 30968216
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiscale models that couple agent-based modeling (ABM) and finite-element modeling (FEM) allow the dynamic simulation of tissue remodeling and wound healing, with mechanical environment influencing cellular behaviors even as tissue remodeling modifies mechanics. One of the challenges in coupling ABM to FEM is that these two domains typically employ grid or element sizes that differ by several orders of magnitude. Here, we develop and demonstrate an interpolation-based method for mapping between ABM and FEM domains of different resolutions that is suitable for linear and nonlinear FEM meshes and balances accuracy with computational demands. We then explore the effects of refining the FEM mesh and the ABM grid in the setting of a fully coupled model. ABM grid refinement studies showed unexpected effects of grid size whenever cells were present at a high enough density for crowding to affect proliferation and migration. In contrast to an FE-only model, refining the FE mesh in the coupled model increased strain differences between adjacent finite elements. Allowing strain-dependent feedback on collagen turnover magnified the effects of regional heterogeneity, producing highly nonlinear spatial and temporal responses. Our results suggest that the choice of both ABM grid and FEM mesh density in coupled models must be guided by experimental data and accompanied by careful grid and mesh refinement studies in the individual domains as well as the fully coupled model.

Citing Articles

On modeling the multiscale mechanobiology of soft tissues: Challenges and progress.

Guo Y, Mofrad M, Tepole A Biophys Rev (Melville). 2024; 3(3):031303.

PMID: 38505274 PMC: 10903412. DOI: 10.1063/5.0085025.


A computational modeling approach for predicting multicell spheroid patterns based on signaling-induced differential adhesion.

Sivakumar N, Warner H, Peirce S, Lazzara M PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(11):e1010701.

PMID: 36441822 PMC: 9747056. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010701.


Comparative Computational Modeling of the Bat and Human Immune Response to Viral Infection with the Comparative Biology Immune Agent Based Model.

Cockrell C, An G Viruses. 2021; 13(8).

PMID: 34452484 PMC: 8402910. DOI: 10.3390/v13081620.


Agent-based model provides insight into the mechanisms behind failed regeneration following volumetric muscle loss injury.

Westman A, Peirce S, Christ G, Blemker S PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(5):e1008937.

PMID: 33970905 PMC: 8110270. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008937.


Multi-scale models of lung fibrosis.

Leonard-Duke J, Evans S, Hannan R, Barker T, Bates J, Bonham C Matrix Biol. 2020; 91-92:35-50.

PMID: 32438056 PMC: 7434655. DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2020.04.003.


References
1.
Huang C, Yannas I . Mechanochemical studies of enzymatic degradation of insoluble collagen fibers. J Biomed Mater Res. 1977; 11(1):137-54. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820110113. View

2.
Rouillard A, Holmes J . Mechanical regulation of fibroblast migration and collagen remodelling in healing myocardial infarcts. J Physiol. 2012; 590(18):4585-602. PMC: 3477759. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.229484. View

3.
Chavali A, Gianchandani E, Tung K, Lawrence M, Peirce S, Papin J . Characterizing emergent properties of immunological systems with multi-cellular rule-based computational modeling. Trends Immunol. 2008; 29(12):589-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2008.08.006. View

4.
Holmes J, Borg T, Covell J . Structure and mechanics of healing myocardial infarcts. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005; 7:223-53. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.060804.100453. View

5.
Dobaczewski M, Gonzalez-Quesada C, Frangogiannis N . The extracellular matrix as a modulator of the inflammatory and reparative response following myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009; 48(3):504-11. PMC: 2824059. DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.07.015. View