» Articles » PMID: 30968135

Dynamics of Transposable Element Invasions with PiRNA Clusters

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Apr 11
PMID 30968135
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In mammals and invertebrates, the proliferation of an invading transposable element (TE) is thought to be stopped by an insertion into a piRNA cluster. Here, we explore the dynamics of TE invasions under this trap model using computer simulations. We found that piRNA clusters confer a substantial benefit, effectively preventing extinction of host populations from a proliferation of deleterious TEs. TE invasions consist of three distinct phases: first, the TE amplifies within the population, next TE proliferation is stopped by segregating cluster insertions, and finally the TE is inactivated by fixation of a cluster insertion. Suppression by segregating cluster insertions is unstable and bursts of TE activity may yet occur. The transposition rate and the population size mostly influence the length of the phases but not the amount of TEs accumulating during an invasion. Solely, the size of piRNA clusters was identified as a major factor influencing TE abundance. We found that a single nonrecombining cluster is more efficient in stopping invasions than clusters distributed over several chromosomes. Recombination among cluster sites makes it necessary that each diploid carries, on the average, four cluster insertions to stop an invasion. Surprisingly, negative selection in a model with piRNA clusters can lead to a novel equilibrium state, where TE copy numbers remain stable despite only some individuals in a population carrying a cluster insertion. In Drosophila melanogaster, the trap model accounts for the abundance of TEs produced in the germline but fails to predict the abundance of TEs produced in the soma.

Citing Articles

On the origin of the P-element invasion in Drosophila simulans.

Wierzbicki F, Pianezza R, Selvaraju D, Eller M, Kofler R Mob DNA. 2025; 16(1):7.

PMID: 40011995 PMC: 11863927. DOI: 10.1186/s13100-025-00345-0.


The impact of insertion bias into piRNA clusters on the invasion of transposable elements.

Pritam S, Scarpa A, Kofler R, Signor S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39464153 PMC: 11507707. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.06.616898.


Comprehensive analysis of subunit expression, prognostic value, and immune infiltration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Zhang Y, Sun Q, Meng W, Xie L, Li N, Zhang J Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(8):1517-1536.

PMID: 39280654 PMC: 11399050. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-95.


Rapid evolution of piRNA clusters in the ovary.

Srivastav S, Feschotte C, Clark A Genome Res. 2024; 34(5):711-724.

PMID: 38749655 PMC: 11216404. DOI: 10.1101/gr.278062.123.


Blessing or curse: how the epigenetic resolution of host-transposable element conflicts shapes their evolutionary dynamics.

Huang Y, Lee Y Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2020):20232775.

PMID: 38593848 PMC: 11003778. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2775.


References
1.
Brookfield J, Badge R . Population genetics models of transposable elements. Genetica. 1997; 100(1-3):281-94. View

2.
Le Rouzic A, Boutin T, Capy P . Long-term evolution of transposable elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(49):19375-80. PMC: 2148297. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705238104. View

3.
Laricchia K, Zdraljevic S, Cook D, Andersen E . Natural Variation in the Distribution and Abundance of Transposable Elements Across the Caenorhabditis elegans Species. Mol Biol Evol. 2017; 34(9):2187-2202. PMC: 5850821. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx155. View

4.
Lewis S, Quarles K, Yang Y, Tanguy M, Frezal L, Smith S . Pan-arthropod analysis reveals somatic piRNAs as an ancestral defence against transposable elements. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017; 2(1):174-181. PMC: 5732027. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0403-4. View

5.
Capy P, Gibert P . Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans: so similar yet so different. Genetica. 2004; 120(1-3):5-16. DOI: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017626.41548.97. View