» Articles » PMID: 30968033

Assessment of Drivers of Antimicrobial Usage in Poultry Farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam: A Combined Participatory Epidemiology and Q-Sorting Approach

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2019 Apr 11
PMID 30968033
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the Mekong Delta of Vietnam, poultry farmers use high amounts of antimicrobials, but little is known about the drivers that influence this usage. We aimed to identify these drivers using a novel approach that combined participatory epidemiology (PE) and Q-sorting (a methodology that allows the analysis of the subjectivity of individuals facing a common phenomenon). A total of 26 semi-structured collective interviews were conducted with 125 farmers representative of the most common farming systems in the area (chickens, meat ducks, and mobile grazing ducks), as well as with 73 farmers' advisors [veterinarians, veterinary drug shop owners, and government veterinarians/commune animal health workers (CAHWs)] in five districts of Dong Thap province (Mekong Delta). Through these interviews, 46 statements related to the antimicrobials' perceived reliability, costs, and impact on flock health were created. These statements were then investigated on 54 individuals (28 farmers and 26 farmers' advisors) using Q-sorting interviews. Farmers generally indicated a higher propensity for antimicrobial usage (AMU) should their flocks encounter bacterial infections (75.0-78.6%) compared with viral infections (8.3-66.7%). The most trusted sources of advice to farmers were, in decreasing order: government veterinarian/CAHWs, their own knowledge/experience, veterinary drug shop owners, and sales persons from pharmaceutical and feed companies. The highest peak of AMU took place in the early phase of the production cycle. Farmers and their advisors showed considerable heterogeneity of attitudes with regards to AMU, with, respectively, four and three discourses representing their views on AMU. Overall, farmers regarded the cost of AMU cheaper than other disease management practices implemented on their farms. However, they also believed that even though these measures were more expensive, they would also lead to more effective disease prevention. A key recommendation from this finding would be for the veterinary authorities to implement long-term sustainable training programs aiming at reducing farmers' reliance on antimicrobials.

Citing Articles

Flexible assessment of biosecurity in small- and medium scale poultry farms in low and middle income countries.

Nielsen S, Kemunto N, Muloi D, Bojesen A, Knight-Jones T, Ayebare D Acta Vet Scand. 2025; 67(1):9.

PMID: 39920832 PMC: 11806742. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-025-00796-8.


Understanding Vietnamese chicken farmers' knowledge and practices related to antimicrobial resistance using an item response theory approach.

Nohrborg S, Nguyen-Thi T, Xuan H, Lindahl J, Boqvist S, Jarhult J Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1319933.

PMID: 38645642 PMC: 11027563. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1319933.


Identification of knowledge gaps in whole-genome sequence analysis of multi-resistant thermotolerant Campylobacter spp.

Zarske M, Luu H, Deneke C, Knuver M, Thieck M, Hoang H BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):156.

PMID: 38331708 PMC: 10851486. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10014-w.


"It's a habit. They've been doing it for decades and they feel good and safe.": A qualitative study of barriers and opportunities to changing antimicrobial use in the Indonesian poultry sector.

Hibbard R, Chapot L, Yusuf H, Ariyanto K, Maulana K, Febriyani W PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0291556.

PMID: 37747889 PMC: 10519599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291556.


Reducing antimicrobial use in chicken production in Vietnam: Exploring the systemic dimension of change.

Batie C, Tran Minh H, Thi Vu V, Thuy Luong D, Thi Pham T, Fortane N PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0290296.

PMID: 37683022 PMC: 10490891. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290296.


References
1.
Farrimond H, Joffe H, Stenner P . A Q-methodological study of smoking identities. Psychol Health. 2010; 25(8):979-98. DOI: 10.1080/08870440903151080. View

2.
Catley A, Alders R, Wood J . Participatory epidemiology: approaches, methods, experiences. Vet J. 2011; 191(2):151-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.03.010. View

3.
Carrique-Mas J, Trung N, Hoa N, Mai H, Thanh T, Campbell J . Antimicrobial usage in chicken production in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Zoonoses Public Health. 2014; 62 Suppl 1:70-8. DOI: 10.1111/zph.12165. View

4.
Visschers V, Backhans A, Collineau L, Iten D, Loesken S, Postma M . Perceptions of antimicrobial usage, antimicrobial resistance and policy measures to reduce antimicrobial usage in convenient samples of Belgian, French, German, Swedish and Swiss pig farmers. Prev Vet Med. 2015; 119(1-2):10-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.01.018. View

5.
Van Boeckel T, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell B, Levin S, Robinson T . Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(18):5649-54. PMC: 4426470. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503141112. View