» Articles » PMID: 30964857

Tubulin MRNA Stability is Sensitive to Change in Microtubule Dynamics Caused by Multiple Physiological and Toxic Cues

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Apr 10
PMID 30964857
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The localization, mass, and dynamics of microtubules are important in many processes. Cells may actively monitor the state of their microtubules and respond to perturbation, but how this occurs outside mitosis is poorly understood. We used gene-expression analysis in quiescent cells to analyze responses to subtle and strong perturbation of microtubules. Genes encoding α-, β, and γ-tubulins (TUBAs, TUBBs, and TUBGs), but not δ- or ε-tubulins (TUBDs or TUBEs), exhibited the strongest differential expression response to microtubule-stabilizing versus destabilizing drugs. Quantitative PCR of exon versus intron sequences confirmed that these changes were caused by regulation of tubulin mRNA stability and not transcription. Using tubulin mRNA stability as a signature to query the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, we find that tubulin genes respond to toxins known to damage microtubules. Importantly, we find many other experimental perturbations, including multiple signaling and metabolic inputs that trigger tubulin differential expression, suggesting their novel, to our knowledge, role in the regulation of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Mechanistic follow-up confirms that one important physiological signal, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K) activity, indeed regulates tubulin mRNA stability via changes in microtubule dynamics. We propose that tubulin gene expression is regulated as part of many coordinated biological responses, with wide implications in physiology and toxicology. Furthermore, we present a new way to discover microtubule regulation using transcriptomics.

Citing Articles

MCAK/Kif2C centromeric activity level tunes K-fiber stability.

Wordeman L, Wagenbach M, Vicente J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027728 PMC: 11870468. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.16.638494.


Soluble αβ-tubulins reversibly sequester TTC5 to regulate tubulin mRNA decay.

Batiuk A, Hopfler M, Almeida A, Teoh En-Jie D, Vadas O, Vartholomaiou E Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9963.

PMID: 39551769 PMC: 11570694. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54036-0.


Role of Ciminalum-4-thiazolidinone Hybrids in Molecular NF-κB Dependent Pathways.

Szlachcikowska D, Tabecka-Lonczynska A, Holota S, Roman O, Shepeta Y, Lesyk R Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(13).

PMID: 39000436 PMC: 11242080. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25137329.


Ciliopathy patient variants reveal organelle-specific functions for TUBB4B in axonemal microtubules.

Dodd D, Mechaussier S, Yeyati P, McPhie F, Anderson J, Khoo C Science. 2024; 384(6694):eadf5489.

PMID: 38662826 PMC: 7616230. DOI: 10.1126/science.adf5489.


Tubulin engineering by semi-synthesis reveals that polyglutamylation directs detyrosination.

Ebberink E, Fernandes S, Hatzopoulos G, Agashe N, Chang P, Guidotti N Nat Chem. 2023; 15(8):1179-1187.

PMID: 37386282 DOI: 10.1038/s41557-023-01228-8.


References
1.
Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W . HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(2):166-9. PMC: 4287950. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. View

2.
Cleveland D . Autoregulated control of tubulin synthesis in animal cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1989; 1(1):10-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0955-0674(89)80030-4. View

3.
Speranza M, Nowicki M, Behera P, Cho C, Chiocca E, Lawler S . BKM-120 (Buparlisib): A Phosphatidyl-Inositol-3 Kinase Inhibitor with Anti-Invasive Properties in Glioblastoma. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:20189. PMC: 4742861. DOI: 10.1038/srep20189. View

4.
Mikaelian I, Buness A, de Vera-Mudry M, Kanwal C, Coluccio D, Rasmussen E . Primary endothelial damage is the mechanism of cardiotoxicity of tubulin-binding drugs. Toxicol Sci. 2010; 117(1):144-51. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq189. View

5.
Dominguez-Brauer C, Thu K, Mason J, Blaser H, Bray M, Mak T . Targeting Mitosis in Cancer: Emerging Strategies. Mol Cell. 2015; 60(4):524-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.11.006. View