» Articles » PMID: 30963457

Flexible Needle and Patient Tracking Using Fractional Scanning in Interventional CT Procedures

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Apr 10
PMID 30963457
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We present a new method for flexible needle and patient localization in interventional CT procedures based on fractional CT scanning. Our method accurately localizes the trajectory of a flexible needle to which a spherical marker is attached at a known distance from the tip with respect to a baseline scan of patient in the CT scanner coordinate frame.

Methods: The localization is achieved with a significantly lower dose compared to a full scan using sparse view angle sampling and without reconstructing the CT image of the repeat scan. Our method starts by performing rigid registration between the patient and the baseline scan in 3D Radon space computed from the sparse projection data. It then computes 2D projection difference images in which the flexible needle and the spherical marker appear as prominent features. Their 3D spatial locations are then automatically extracted from the projection images to accurately trace the flexible needle trajectory. To validate our method, we conducted registration and needle trajectory localization experiments in seven abdomen phantom scans using a short and a long flexible needle.

Results: Our experimental results yield a mean needle trajectory localization error of 0.7 ± 0.2 mm and a mean tip localization error of 2.4 ± 0.9 mm with a [Formula: see text]7.5 radiation dose reduction with respect to a full CT scan.

Conclusions: The significant radiation dose reduction enables more frequent needle trajectory localization during the needle insertion for a similar total dose, or a reduced total dose for the same localization frequency.

Citing Articles

Hybrid Deep Learning and Model-Based Needle Shape Prediction.

Lezcano D, Zhetpissov Y, Bernardes M, Moreira P, Tokuda J, Kim J IEEE Sens J. 2024; 24(11):18359-18371.

PMID: 39301509 PMC: 11410364. DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2024.3386120.


Optical Fiber-Based Needle Shape Sensing in Real Tissue: Single Core vs. Multicore Approaches.

Lezcano D, Zhetpissov Y, Cheng A, Kim J, Iordachita I J Med Robot Res. 2024; 9(1-2).

PMID: 38948444 PMC: 11212684. DOI: 10.1142/s2424905x23500046.


Optical Fiber-Based Needle Shape Sensing in Real Tissue: Single Core vs. Multicore Approaches.

Lezcano D, Zhetpissov Y, Cheng A, Kim J, Iordachita I ArXiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37731661 PMC: 10508835.

References
1.
Sheafor D, Paulson E, Kliewer M, Delong D, Nelson R . Comparison of sonographic and CT guidance techniques: does CT fluoroscopy decrease procedure time?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174(4):939-42. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.174.4.1740939. View

2.
Mettler Jr F, Wiest P, Locken J, Kelsey C . CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot. 2001; 20(4):353-9. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/20/4/301. View

3.
Stoeckelhuber B, Leibecke T, Schulz E, Melchert U, Bergmann-Koester C, Helmberger T . Radiation dose to the radiologist's hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005; 28(5):589-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0104-2. View

4.
Chodick G, Ronckers C, Shalev V, Ron E . Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007; 9(8):584-7. View

5.
Orth R, Wallace M, Kuo M . C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008; 19(6):814-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.02.002. View