» Articles » PMID: 30962384

Parallel Spatial Channels Converge at a Bottleneck in Anterior Word-selective Cortex

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Apr 10
PMID 30962384
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In most environments, the visual system is confronted with many relevant objects simultaneously. That is especially true during reading. However, behavioral data demonstrate that a serial bottleneck prevents recognition of more than one word at a time. We used fMRI to investigate how parallel spatial channels of visual processing converge into a serial bottleneck for word recognition. Participants viewed pairs of words presented simultaneously. We found that retinotopic cortex processed the two words in parallel spatial channels, one in each contralateral hemisphere. Responses were higher for attended than for ignored words but were not reduced when attention was divided. We then analyzed two word-selective regions along the occipitotemporal sulcus (OTS) of both hemispheres (subregions of the visual word form area, VWFA). Unlike retinotopic regions, each word-selective region responded to words on both sides of fixation. Nonetheless, a single region in the left hemisphere (posterior OTS) contained spatial channels for both hemifields that were independently modulated by selective attention. Thus, the left posterior VWFA supports parallel processing of multiple words. In contrast, activity in a more anterior word-selective region in the left hemisphere (mid OTS) was consistent with a single channel, showing () limited spatial selectivity, () no effect of spatial attention on mean response amplitudes, and () sensitivity to lexical properties of only one attended word. Therefore, the visual system can process two words in parallel up to a late stage in the ventral stream. The transition to a single channel is consistent with the observed bottleneck in behavior.

Citing Articles

Individual variation in the functional lateralization of human ventral temporal cortex: Local competition and long-range coupling.

Blauch N, Plaut D, Vin R, Behrmann M Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025; 3.

PMID: 40078535 PMC: 11894816. DOI: 10.1162/imag_a_00488.


Memorability of novel words correlates with anterior fusiform activity during reading.

Woolnough O, Tandon N Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1902.

PMID: 39988589 PMC: 11847940. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57220-y.


Demystifying visual word form area visual and nonvisual response properties with precision fMRI.

Li J, Hiersche K, Saygin Z iScience. 2025; 27(12):111481.

PMID: 39759006 PMC: 11696768. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111481.


Individual variation in the functional lateralization of human ventral temporal cortex: Local competition and long-range coupling.

Blauch N, Plaut D, Vin R, Behrmann M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39464049 PMC: 11507683. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.15.618268.


The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Processing during At-a-Glance Reading.

Flower N, Pylkkanen L J Neurosci. 2024; 44(48).

PMID: 39419549 PMC: 11604140. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0374-24.2024.


References
1.
Gandhi S, Heeger D, Boynton G . Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(6):3314-9. PMC: 15939. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3314. View

2.
Boynton G, Demb J, Glover G, Heeger D . Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination. Vision Res. 1999; 39(2):257-69. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00113-8. View

3.
Cohen L, Dehaene S, Naccache L, Lehericy S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Henaff M . The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain. 2000; 123 ( Pt 2):291-307. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.2.291. View

4.
Ress D, Backus B, Heeger D . Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(9):940-5. DOI: 10.1038/78856. View

5.
Dehaene S, Le ClecH G, Poline J, Le Bihan D, Cohen L . The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. Neuroreport. 2002; 13(3):321-5. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200203040-00015. View