» Articles » PMID: 30962127

Muscle Activity During Low-speed Rear Impact

Overview
Date 2019 Apr 10
PMID 30962127
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Whiplash associated disorders remain a major health problem in terms of impact on health care and on societal costs. Aetiology remains controversial including the old supposition that the cervical muscles do not play a significant role. This study examined the muscle activity from relevant muscles during rear-end impacts in an effort to gauge their influence on the aetiology of whiplash associated disorders.

Methods: Volunteers were subjected to a sub-injury level of rear impact. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to record cervical muscle activity before, during and after impact. Muscle response time and EMG signal amplitude were analysed. Head, pelvis, and T1 acceleration data were recorded.

Results: The activities of the cervical muscles were found to be significant. The sternocleidomastoideus, trapezius and erector spinae were activated on average 59 ms, 73 ms and 84 ms after the impact stimulus, respectively, prior to peak head acceleration (113 ms).

Conclusion: The cervical muscles reacted prior to peak head acceleration, thus in time to influence whiplash biomechanics and possibly injury mechanisms. It is recommended therefore, that muscular influences be incorporated into the development of the new rear-impact crash test dummy in order to make the dummy as biofidelic as possible.

Citing Articles

Kinematic analysis of an unrestrained passenger in an autonomous vehicle during emergency braking.

Santos-Cuadros S, Page Del Pozo A, Alvarez-Caldas C, San Roman Garcia J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1270181.

PMID: 38532878 PMC: 10963408. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1270181.


Evaluation of surface electromyography of selected neck muscles during the whiplash mechanism in aware and unaware conditions due to safe punching in kickboxing.

Pashaei M, Babakhani F, Banihashemi K BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):429.

PMID: 37254094 PMC: 10227954. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06563-y.


Fatty infiltrate and neck muscle volume in individuals with chronic whiplash associated disorders compared to healthy controls - a cross sectional case-control study.

Lund N, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Elliott J, Peterson G, Borga M, Zsigmond P BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):181.

PMID: 36906537 PMC: 10007742. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06289-x.


Surface Electromyography Study Using a Low-Cost System: Are There Neck Muscles Differences When the Passenger Is Warned during an Emergency Braking Inside an Autonomous Vehicle?.

Santos-Cuadros S, Fuentes Del Toro S, Olmeda E, San Roman J Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(16).

PMID: 34450818 PMC: 8399791. DOI: 10.3390/s21165378.


Cervical Muscle Activation Due to an Applied Force in Response to Different Types of Acoustic Warnings.

Homayounpour M, Gomez N, Vasavada A, Merryweather A Ann Biomed Eng. 2021; 49(9):2260-2272.

PMID: 33768412 PMC: 8455495. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02757-4.


References
1.
Corcos D, Gottlieb G, Latash M, Almeida G, Agarwal G . Electromechanical delay: An experimental artifact. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 2(2):59-68. DOI: 10.1016/1050-6411(92)90017-D. View

2.
Forssberg H, Hirschfeld H . Postural adjustments in sitting humans following external perturbations: muscle activity and kinematics. Exp Brain Res. 1994; 97(3):515-27. DOI: 10.1007/BF00241545. View

3.
Brault J, Siegmund G, Wheeler J . Cervical muscle response during whiplash: evidence of a lengthening muscle contraction. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2000; 15(6):426-35. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00097-2. View

4.
Spitzer W, Skovron M, Salmi L, Cassidy J, Duranceau J, Suissa S . Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(8 Suppl):1S-73S. View

5.
Siegmund G, Sanderson D, Inglis J . The effect of perturbation acceleration and advance warning on the neck postural responses of seated subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 144(3):314-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1048-2. View