Wearable EEG and Beyond

Overview

Journal Biomed Eng Lett

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2019 Apr 9

PMID 30956880

Citations 65

Authors

Alexander J Casson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a widely used non-invasive method for monitoring the brain. It is based upon placing conductive electrodes on the scalp which measure the small electrical potentials that arise outside of the head due to neuronal action within the brain. Historically this has been a large and bulky technology, restricted to the monitoring of subjects in a lab or clinic while they are stationary. Over the last decade much research effort has been put into the creation of "wearable EEG" which overcomes these limitations and allows the long term non-invasive recording of brain signals while people are out of the lab and moving about. This paper reviews the recent progress in this field, with particular emphasis on the electrodes used to make connections to the head and the physical EEG hardware. The emergence of conformal "tattoo" type EEG electrodes is highlighted as a key next step for giving very small and socially discrete units. In addition, new recommendations for the performance validation of novel electrode technologies are given, with standards in this area seen as the current main bottleneck to the wider take up of wearable EEG. The paper concludes by considering the next steps in the creation of next generation wearable EEG units, showing that a wide range of research avenues are present.

Citing Articles

Movement Disorders and Smart Wrist Devices: A Comprehensive Study.

Caroppo A, Manni A, Rescio G, Carluccio A, Siciliano P, Leone A Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(1.

PMID: 39797057 PMC: 11723440. DOI: 10.3390/s25010266.

Driver fatigue recognition using limited amount of individual electroencephalogram.

Seo P, Kim H, Kim K Biomed Eng Lett. 2025; 15(1):143-157.

PMID: 39781053 PMC: 11704104. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00431-x.

Overview of Wearable Healthcare Devices for Clinical Decision Support in the Prehospital Setting.

Gathright R, Mejia I, Gonzalez J, Hernandez Torres S, Berard D, Snider E Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771939 PMC: 11679471. DOI: 10.3390/s24248204.

Exploring the Utility of the Muse Headset for Capturing the N400: Dependability and Single-Trial Analysis.

Hayes H, Magne C Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771698 PMC: 11679084. DOI: 10.3390/s24247961.

A Method for the Spatial Interpolation of EEG Signals Based on the Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Network.

Hu W, Ji B, Gao K Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(16).

PMID: 39204910 PMC: 11359714. DOI: 10.3390/s24165215.

References

Norton J, Lee D, Lee J, Lee W, Kwon O, Won P . Soft, curved electrode systems capable of integration on the auricle as a persistent brain-computer interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(13):3920-5. PMC: 4386388. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1424875112. View

Xu J, Mitra S, Van Hoof C, Yazicioglu R, Makinwa K . Active Electrodes for Wearable EEG Acquisition: Review and Electronics Design Methodology. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2017; 10:187-198. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2017.2656388. View

Symeonidou E, Nordin A, Hairston W, Ferris D . Effects of Cable Sway, Electrode Surface Area, and Electrode Mass on Electroencephalography Signal Quality during Motion. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(4). PMC: 5948545. DOI: 10.3390/s18041073. View

Kohli S, Casson A . Towards out-of-the-lab EEG in uncontrolled environments: Feasibility study of dry EEG recordings during exercise bike riding. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016; 2015:1025-8. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318539. View

Matthews R, McDonald N, Hervieux P, Turner P, Steindorf M . A wearable physiological sensor suite for unobtrusive monitoring of physiological and cognitive state. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2007:5276-81. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353532. View

Looney D, Kidmose P, Park C, Ungstrup M, Rank M, Rosenkranz K . The in-the-ear recording concept: user-centered and wearable brain monitoring. IEEE Pulse. 2012; 3(6):32-42. DOI: 10.1109/MPUL.2012.2216717. View

Casson A, Yates D, Smith S, Duncan J, Rodriguez-Villegas E . Wearable electroencephalography. What is it, why is it needed, and what does it entail?. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2010; 29(3):44-56. DOI: 10.1109/MEMB.2010.936545. View

Blum S, Debener S, Emkes R, Volkening N, Fudickar S, Bleichner M . EEG Recording and Online Signal Processing on Android: A Multiapp Framework for Brain-Computer Interfaces on Smartphone. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2017:3072870. PMC: 5733949. DOI: 10.1155/2017/3072870. View

Mihajlovic V, Grundlehner B, Vullers R, Penders J . Wearable, wireless EEG solutions in daily life applications: what are we missing?. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014; 19(1):6-21. DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2328317. View

10.

Wagner J, Solis-Escalante T, Grieshofer P, Neuper C, Muller-Putz G, Scherer R . Level of participation in robotic-assisted treadmill walking modulates midline sensorimotor EEG rhythms in able-bodied subjects. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(3):1203-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.019. View

11.

Poirier C, Gadfort P, Dixon A, Nonte M, Conroy J, Hairston W . Hardware Implementation of an Adaptive Data Acquisition System for Real-World EEG. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018; 2018:3294-3297. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513037. View

12.

Debener S, Emkes R, De Vos M, Bleichner M . Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:16743. PMC: 4648079. DOI: 10.1038/srep16743. View

13.

Debener S, Minow F, Emkes R, Gandras K, De Vos M . How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for a walk?. Psychophysiology. 2012; 49(11):1617-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01471.x. View

14.

Broccard F, Mullen T, Chi Y, Peterson D, Iversen J, Arnold M . Closed-loop brain-machine-body interfaces for noninvasive rehabilitation of movement disorders. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014; 42(8):1573-93. PMC: 4099421. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1032-6. View

15.

Allen J, Kline J . Frontal EEG asymmetry, emotion, and psychopathology: the first, and the next 25 years. Biol Psychol. 2004; 67(1-2):1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.001. View

16.

Muraja-Murro A, Mervaala E, Westeren-Punnonen S, Lepola P, Toyras J, Myllymaa S . Forehead EEG electrode set versus full-head scalp EEG in 100 patients with altered mental state. Epilepsy Behav. 2015; 49:245-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.041. View

17.

Slipher G, Hairston W, Bradford J, Bain E, Mrozek R . Carbon nanofiber-filled conductive silicone elastomers as soft, dry bioelectronic interfaces. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0189415. PMC: 5800568. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189415. View

18.

Arico P, Borghini G, Di Flumeri G, Sciaraffa N, Babiloni F . Passive BCI beyond the lab: current trends and future directions. Physiol Meas. 2018; 39(8):08TR02. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aad57e. View

19.

de Camp N, Kalinka G, Bergeler J . Light-cured polymer electrodes for non-invasive EEG recordings. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):14041. PMC: 6145882. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32304-6. View

20.

Jacob N, Balaban E, Saunders R, Batchelor J, Yeates S, Casson A . An Exploration of Behind-the-Ear ECG Signals From a Single Ear Using Inkjet Printed Conformal Tattoo Electrodes. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018; 2018:1283-1286. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512538. View