» Articles » PMID: 30956737

Multiple Diversity Concepts and Their Ethical-epistemic Implications

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Apr 9
PMID 30956737
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A concept of diversity is an understanding of what makes a group diverse that may be applicable in a variety of contexts. We distinguish three diversity concepts, show that each can be found in discussions of diversity in science, and explain how they tend to be associated with distinct epistemic and ethical rationales. Yet philosophical literature on diversity among scientists has given little attention to distinct concepts of diversity. This is significant because the unappreciated existence of multiple diversity concepts can generate unclarity about the meaning of "diversity," lead to problematic inferences from empirical research, and obscure complex ethical-epistemic questions about how to define diversity in specific cases. We illustrate some ethical-epistemic implications of our proposal by reference to an example of deliberative mini-publics on human tissue biobanking.

Citing Articles

Engaging publics in biobanking and genetic research governance - a literature review towards informing practice in India.

Warrier P, Ho C, Bull S, Vaz M, Vaz M Wellcome Open Res. 2024; 6:5.

PMID: 38645686 PMC: 11026954. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16558.2.


Data Representativeness in Accessibility Datasets: A Meta-Analysis.

Kamikubo R, Wang L, Marte C, Mahmood A, Kacorri H ASSETS. 2023; 2022.

PMID: 36939417 PMC: 10024595. DOI: 10.1145/3517428.3544826.


Pro-Diversity Beliefs and the Diverse Person's Burden.

Steel D, Paier K Synthese. 2022; 200(5):357.

PMID: 36032352 PMC: 9395773. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03785-w.


Sharing linked data sets for research: results from a deliberative public engagement event in British Columbia, Canada.

Teng J, Bentley C, Burgess M, ODoherty K, McGrail K Int J Popul Data Sci. 2021; 4(1):1103.

PMID: 34095532 PMC: 8142623. DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.1103.


Information elaboration and epistemic effects of diversity.

Steel D, Fazelpour S, Crewe B, Gillette K Synthese. 2021; 198(2):1287-1307.

PMID: 33707800 PMC: 7907020. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02108-w.

References
1.
Minda J, Smith J . Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 27(3):775-99. View

2.
Hong L, Page S . Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(46):16385-9. PMC: 528939. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403723101. View

3.
Ricotta C . Through the jungle of biological diversity. Acta Biotheor. 2005; 53(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1007/s10441-005-7001-6. View

4.
Sarkar S . Ecological diversity and biodiversity as concepts for conservation planning: comments on Ricotta. Acta Biotheor. 2006; 54(2):133-40. DOI: 10.1007/s10441-006-8259-z. View

5.
Stirling A . A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. J R Soc Interface. 2007; 4(15):707-19. PMC: 2373389. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2007.0213. View