» Articles » PMID: 30948774

Global Synergies and Trade-offs Between Multiple Dimensions of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Apr 6
PMID 30948774
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ensuring the persistence of biodiversity and ecosystem services represents a global challenge that need to be addressed with high urgency. Global priority areas can only be identified by means of an integrated prioritization approach that would not only preserve species numbers and ecosystem services, but also the evolutionary and functional components of diversity. In this study we combine global datasets on the distribution of mammals and birds with species traits and phylogenetic data and we identify conservation priorities for taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity, as well as for three ecosystem services, including potential for carbon sequestration, pollination potential and groundwater recharge. We show that, when priority areas are identified based only on individual, e.g. functional diversity, or any combination of the three biodiversity components, these areas do not allow a sufficient protection of the three ecosystem services. However, an integrated approach whereby prioritization is based on all biodiversity components and ecosystem services would allow to identify areas that maximize protection of all ecosystem services with a minimal loss in biodiversity coverage. Our results highlight the need for an integrated conservation planning framework in order to optimally allocate resources and achieve the long-term preservation of the multiple dimensions of biodiversity and ecosystems services.

Citing Articles

Optimizing restoration: A holistic spatial approach to deliver Nature's Contributions to People with minimal tradeoffs and maximal equity.

Gopalakrishna T, Visconti P, Lomax G, Boere E, Malhi Y, Roy P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(34):e2402970121.

PMID: 39133856 PMC: 11348303. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402970121.


Integrating remote sensing with ecology and evolution to advance biodiversity conservation.

Cavender-Bares J, Schneider F, Santos M, Armstrong A, Carnaval A, Dahlin K Nat Ecol Evol. 2022; 6(5):506-519.

PMID: 35332280 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01702-5.


Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems.

Mammola S, Meierhofer M, Borges P, Colado R, Culver D, Deharveng L Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022; 97(4):1476-1510.

PMID: 35315207 PMC: 9545027. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12851.


Food Systems Transformation for Child Health and Well-Being: The Essential Role of Dairy.

Miller G, Kanter M, Rycken L, Comerford K, Gardner N, Brown K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(19).

PMID: 34639835 PMC: 8507772. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910535.


More than Maize, Bananas, and Coffee: The Inter- and Intraspecific Diversity of Edible Plants of the Huastec Mayan Landscape Mosaics in Mexico.

Heindorf C, Reyes-Aguero J, Fortanelli-Martinez J, van t Hooft A Econ Bot. 2021; 75(2):158-174.

PMID: 34257465 PMC: 8269408. DOI: 10.1007/s12231-021-09520-9.


References
1.
Joppa L, Visconti P, Jenkins C, Pimm S . Achieving the convention on biological diversity's goals for plant conservation. Science. 2013; 341(6150):1100-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1241706. View

2.
Tucker C, Cadotte M, Carvalho S, Davies T, Ferrier S, Fritz S . A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016; 92(2):698-715. PMC: 5096690. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12252. View

3.
Safi K, Cianciaruso M, Loyola R, Brito D, Armour-Marshall K, Diniz-Filho J . Understanding global patterns of mammalian functional and phylogenetic diversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 366(1577):2536-44. PMC: 3138614. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0024. View

4.
Foley J, Ramankutty N, Brauman K, Cassidy E, Gerber J, Johnston M . Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011; 478(7369):337-42. DOI: 10.1038/nature10452. View

5.
Winter M, Devictor V, Schweiger O . Phylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012; 28(4):199-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.015. View