Nerve Conduction Studies in Surgical Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Patients

Overview

Journal Hand (N Y)

Publisher Sage Publications

Specialties General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2019 Apr 6

PMID 30947553

Citations 4

Authors

Daniel J Shubert

Joseph Prudhomme

Shafic Sraj

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) serve a prominent role in the diagnostic workup of cubital tunnel syndrome (CBTS), but their reported sensitivity varies widely. The goals of our study were to determine the sensitivity of EDX in a cohort of patients who responded well to surgical cubital tunnel release (CBTR), and whether the implementation of the Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) criteria improves the sensitivity. We identified 118 elbows with clinical CBTS who had preoperative EDX and underwent CBTR. The EDX diagnoses were CBTS, ulnar neuropathy (UN), and normal ulnar nerves. We divided the 118 elbows into those that received above-elbow stimulation (XE group) and those that did not (non-XE group). We calculated the sensitivities for all groups and reinterpreted the results according to the AANEM guidelines. Cubital tunnel release provided significant relief in 93.6% of the elbows. Based on the EDX reports, 11% patients had clear CBTS, 23% had UN, and 66% showed no UN. The sensitivities were 11.7% for CBTS and 34.2% for any UN. In the XE group, the sensitivity of the EDX reports for CBTS and UN climbed to 33.3% and 58.3%, respectively. When we calculated the across-elbow motor nerve conduction velocity, the sensitivity for CBTS and UN was 87.5% and 100%, respectively. The XE and non-XE groups showed no difference except for sex, bilaterality, concomitant carpal tunnel release, and obesity ( < .05). Implementing AANEM guidelines results in significant improvement in correlation of clinical and electrodiagnostic findings of CBTS.

Citing Articles

Electrodiagnostic Testing Predicts Postdecompression Outcomes in Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

Cuneo K, McQuillan T, Sullivan C, Cooke H, Kapp S, Wagner E J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024; 6(6):779-783.

PMID: 39703573 PMC: 11652291. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.08.013.

Clinical significance of upper arm motor nerve conduction velocity in cubital tunnel syndrome.

Uehara K, Hashimoto T, Yukata K, Imajo Y, Funaba M, Fujii K Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241293360.

PMID: 39545006 PMC: 11559839. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241293360.

Modern Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Evidence and Controversy.

Graf A, Ahmed A, Roundy R, Gottschalk M, Dempsey A J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023; 5(4):547-560.

PMID: 37521554 PMC: 10382899. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.07.008.

Diagnosis of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Using Deep Learning on Ultrasonographic Images.

Shinohara I, Inui A, Mifune Y, Nishimoto H, Yamaura K, Mukohara S Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35328185 PMC: 8947597. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030632.

References

An T, Evanoff B, Boyer M, Osei D . The Prevalence of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study in a U.S. Metropolitan Cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(5):408-416. PMC: 5324036. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01162. View

Mallette P, Zhao M, Zurakowski D, Ring D . Muscle atrophy at diagnosis of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2007; 32(6):855-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.009. View

Beekman R, Visser L . Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle Nerve. 2003; 27(1):26-33. DOI: 10.1002/mus.10227. View

Root C, London D, Schroeder N, Calfee R . Anatomical relationships and branching patterns of the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 38(6):1131-6. PMC: 3934360. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.016. View

Posner M . Compressive ulnar neuropathies at the elbow: I. Etiology and diagnosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998; 6(5):282-8. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199809000-00003. View

Landau M, Campbell W . Clinical features and electrodiagnosis of ulnar neuropathies. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2012; 24(1):49-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2012.08.019. View

Shakir A, Micklesen P, Robinson L . Which motor nerve conduction study is best in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow?. Muscle Nerve. 2004; 29(4):585-90. DOI: 10.1002/mus.10513. View

Kothari M, Preston D . Comparison of the flexed and extended elbow positions in localizing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Muscle Nerve. 1995; 18(3):336-40. DOI: 10.1002/mus.880180312. View

Dy C, Mackinnon S . Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9(2):178-84. PMC: 4896870. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9327-x. View

10.

Boone S, Gelberman R, Calfee R . The Management of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40(9):1897-904. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.011. View

11.

Kincaid J, Phillips 2nd L, Daube J . The evaluation of suspected ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Normal conduction study values. Arch Neurol. 1986; 43(1):44-7. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520010040019. View

12.

Goldberg B, Light T, Blair S . Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: results of medial epicondylectomy. J Hand Surg Am. 1989; 14(2 Pt 1):182-8. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(89)90003-8. View

13.

Spinner M, KAPLAN E . The relationship of the ulnar nerve to the medial intermuscular septum in the arm and its clinical significance. Hand. 1976; 8(3):239-42. DOI: 10.1016/0072-968x(76)90008-5. View

14.

Cutts S . Cubital tunnel syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 2007; 83(975):28-31. PMC: 2599973. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.047456. View

15.

Rayan G, Jensen C, Duke J . Elbow flexion test in the normal population. J Hand Surg Am. 1992; 17(1):86-9. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(92)90119-a. View

16.

Novak C, Lee G, Mackinnon S, Lay L . Provocative testing for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1994; 19(5):817-20. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90193-7. View

17.

Tapadia M, Mozaffar T, Gupta R . Compressive neuropathies of the upper extremity: update on pathophysiology, classification, and electrodiagnostic findings. J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35(4):668-77. PMC: 4715364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.007. View

18.

Jablecki C, Andary M, So Y, Wilkins D, Williams F . Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee. Muscle Nerve. 1993; 16(12):1392-414. DOI: 10.1002/mus.880161220. View

19.

Feinberg J . EMG: myths and facts. HSS J. 2008; 2(1):19-21. PMC: 2504120. DOI: 10.1007/s11420-005-0124-0. View

20.

Palmer B, Hughes T . Cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2010; 35(1):153-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.004. View