» Articles » PMID: 309467

Comparison, by Freeze-fracture Electron Microscopy, of Chromatophores, Spheroplast-derived Membrane Vesicles, and Whole Cells of Rhodopseudomonas Sphaeroides

Overview
Journal J Bacteriol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1978 Nov 1
PMID 309467
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

By using freeze-fracture electron microscopy, chromatophores and spheroplast-derived membrane vesicles from photosynthetically grown Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides were compared with cytoplasmic membrane and intracellular vesicles of whole cells. In whole cells, the extracellular fracture faces of both cytoplasmic membrane and vesicles contained particles of 11-nm diameter at a density of about 5 particles per 10(4) nm2. The protoplasmic fracture faces contained particles of 11 to 12-nm diameter at a density of 14.6 particles per 10(4) nm2 on the cytoplasmic membrane and a density of 31.3 particles per 10(4) nm2 on the vesicle membranes. The spheroplast-derived membrane fraction consisted of large vesicles of irregular shape and varied size, often enclosing other vesicles. Sixty-six percent of the spheroplast-derived vesicles were oriented in the opposite way from the intracellular vesicle membranes of whole cells. Eighty percent of the total vesicle surface area that was exposed to the external medium (unenclosed vesicles) showed this opposite orientation. The chromatophore fractions contained spherical vesicles of uniform size approximately equal to the size of the vesicles in whole cells. The majority (79%) of the chromatophores purified on sucrose gradients were oriented in the same way as vesicles in whole cells, whereas after agarose filtration almost all (97%) were oriented in this way. Thus, on the basis of morphological criteria, most spheroplast-derived vesicles were oriented oppositely from most chromatophores.

Citing Articles

Examination of the putative Ca2+-binding site in the light-harvesting complex 1 of thermophilic purple sulfur bacterium Thermochromatium tepidum.

Yu L, Kato S, Wang Z Photosynth Res. 2010; 106(3):215-20.

PMID: 20886371 DOI: 10.1007/s11120-010-9596-y.


Exploring photosynthesis by electron tomography.

Hohmann-Marriott M, Roberson R Photosynth Res. 2009; 102(2-3):177-88.

PMID: 19548110 DOI: 10.1007/s11120-009-9452-0.


The organization of LH2 complexes in membranes from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Olsen J, Tucker J, Timney J, Qian P, Vassilev C, Hunter C J Biol Chem. 2008; 283(45):30772-9.

PMID: 18723509 PMC: 2662159. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M804824200.


Mutation of a single residue, beta-glutamate-20, alters protein-lipid interactions of light harvesting complex II.

Kwa L, Wegmann D, Brugger B, Wieland F, Wanner G, Braun P Mol Microbiol. 2007; 67(1):63-77.

PMID: 18034796 PMC: 2229836. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06017.x.


Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides membranes: alterations in phospholipid composition in aerobically and phototrophically grown cells.

Onishi J, Niederman R J Bacteriol. 1982; 149(3):831-9.

PMID: 6977537 PMC: 216469. DOI: 10.1128/jb.149.3.831-839.1982.


References
1.
Holt S, Marr A . LOCATION OF CHLOROPHYLL IN RHODOSPIRILLUM RUBRUM. J Bacteriol. 1965; 89:1402-12. PMC: 277658. DOI: 10.1128/jb.89.5.1402-1412.1965. View

2.
LASCELLES J . Adaptation to form bacteriochlorophyll in Rhodopseudomonas spheroides: changes in activity of enzymes concerned in pyrrole synthesis. Biochem J. 1959; 72:508-18. PMC: 1196963. DOI: 10.1042/bj0720508. View

3.
VATTER A, WOLFE R . The structure of photosynthetic bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1958; 75(4):480-8. PMC: 314683. DOI: 10.1128/jb.75.4.480-488.1958. View

4.
Matsuura K, Nishimura M . Sidedness of membrane structures in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Electrochemical titration of the spectrum changes of carotenoid in spheroplasts, spheroplast membrane vesicles and chromatophores. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977; 459(3):483-91. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(77)90047-0. View

5.
Oelze J, Drews G . Membranes of photosynthetic bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972; 265(2):209-39. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4157(72)90003-2. View