Women's Circles As a Culturally Safe Psychosocial Intervention in Guatemalan Indigenous Communities: a Community-led Pilot Randomised Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Indigenous Maya women in Guatemala show some of the worst maternal health indicators worldwide. Our objective was to test acceptability, feasibility and impact of a co-designed group psychosocial intervention (Women's Circles) in a population with significant need but no access to mental health services.
Methods: A parallel group pilot randomised study was undertaken in five rural Mam and three periurban K'iche' communities. Participants included 84 women (12 per community, in seven of the communities) randomly allocated to intervention and 71 to control groups; all were pregnant and/or within 2 years postpartum. The intervention consisted of 10 sessions co-designed with and facilitated by 16 circle leaders. Main outcome measures were: maternal psychosocial distress (HSCL-25), wellbeing (MHC-SF), self-efficacy and engagement in early infant stimulation activities. In-depth interviews also assessed acceptability and feasibility.
Results: The intervention proved feasible and well accepted by circle leaders and participating women. 1-month post-intervention, wellbeing scores (p-value 0.008) and self-care self-efficacy (0.049) scores were higher among intervention compared to control women. Those women who attended more sessions had higher wellbeing (0.007), self-care and infant-care self-efficacy (0.014 and 0.043, respectively), and early infant stimulation (0.019) scores.
Conclusions: The pilot demonstrated acceptability, feasibility and potential efficacy to justify a future definitive randomised controlled trial. Co-designed women's groups provide a safe space where indigenous women can collectively improve their functioning and wellbeing.
Trial Registration: ISRCTN13964819 . Registered 26 June 2018, retrospectively registered.
To gather is to heal: Women's mental health circles in rural Chiapas, Mexico.
Ortega A, Buckner M Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025; 12:e22.
PMID: 40028383 PMC: 11867813. DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.15.
Herrera-Anazco P, Benites-Meza J, Caira-Chuquineyra B, Fernandez-Guzman D, Hernandez-Bustamante E, Benites-Zapata V J Immigr Minor Health. 2024; 26(3):604-622.
PMID: 38294634 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-023-01578-y.
Purgato M, Prina E, Ceccarelli C, Cadorin C, Abdulmalik J, Amaddeo F Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 10:CD014722.
PMID: 37873968 PMC: 10594594. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014722.pub2.
How does participatory research work: protocol for a realist synthesis.
Belaid L, Sarmiento I, Dion A, Pimentel J, Rojas-Cardenas A, Cockcroft A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(9):e074075.
PMID: 37775285 PMC: 10546155. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074075.
The significance of feeling safe for resilience of adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa.
Bandeira M, Graham M, Ebersohn L Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1183748.
PMID: 37663363 PMC: 10469746. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183748.