» Articles » PMID: 30926852

Mitochondrial DNA and Genomic DNA Ratio in Embryo Culture Medium is Not a Reliable Predictor for in Vitro Fertilization Outcome

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Mar 31
PMID 30926852
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To investigate the ratio of mitochondrial DNA to genomic DNA (mt/gDNA) in embryo culture medium as a possible predictor for embryonic development and pregnancy outcome, we collected a total of 93 embryo biopsy specimens from 52 women at the corresponding Day 3 (D3) and Day 5 (D5) embryo culture medium of in vitro fertilization. With the multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles method of next-generation sequencing for whole genome amplification, we examined the karyotype of the biopsy samples and the mt/gDNA ratio in the culture medium. Results showed that the ratio of mt/gDNA had an upward trend with decreasing trophectoderm levels with no significant difference. At the same time, from D3 to D5, the mt/gDNA ratio in the medium of embryos that failed to become blastocysts showed an upward trend, and the mt/gDNA ratio of medium from embryos that reached blastulation with successful pregnancy showed a decreasing trend, but the differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that there is a certain correlation between mt/gDNA ratio and early embryonic development, but it does not reach a level that can be used as a clinical predictor.

Citing Articles

Cellular Senescence in Aging Lungs and Diseases.

Aghali A, Koloko Ngassie M, Pabelick C, Prakash Y Cells. 2022; 11(11).

PMID: 35681476 PMC: 9179897. DOI: 10.3390/cells11111781.


Digital PCR Detection of mtDNA/gDNA Ratio in Embryo Culture Medium for Prediction of Embryo Development Potential.

Zhang Q, Ji H, Shi J, Wang L, Ding L, Jiang Y Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2021; 14:521-531.

PMID: 33958889 PMC: 8096441. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S304747.


Comparative analysis of cell-free DNA content in culture medium and mitochondrial DNA copy number in porcine parthenogenetically activated embryos.

Kobayashi M, Ito J, Shirasuna K, Kuwayama T, Iwata H J Reprod Dev. 2020; 66(6):539-546.

PMID: 32908082 PMC: 7768170. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2020-097.

References
1.
Almeida Santos T, El Shourbagy S, St John J . Mitochondrial content reflects oocyte variability and fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(3):584-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.017. View

2.
Zong C, Lu S, Chapman A, Xie X . Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell. Science. 2012; 338(6114):1622-6. PMC: 3600412. DOI: 10.1126/science.1229164. View

3.
Cree L, Samuels D, Chuva de Sousa Lopes S, Rajasimha H, Wonnapinij P, Mann J . A reduction of mitochondrial DNA molecules during embryogenesis explains the rapid segregation of genotypes. Nat Genet. 2008; 40(2):249-54. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2007.63. View

4.
Kupka M, DHooghe T, Ferraretti A, de Mouzon J, Erb K, Castilla J . Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(2):233-48. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev319. View

5.
Palini S, Galluzzi L, De Stefani S, Bianchi M, Wells D, Magnani M . Genomic DNA in human blastocoele fluid. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 26(6):603-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.012. View