» Articles » PMID: 30926724

Assessing the Architecture of Locomotor Evolution with Bulk Segregant Analysis

Overview
Journal G3 (Bethesda)
Date 2019 Mar 31
PMID 30926724
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Behavior is frequently predicted to be especially important for evolution in novel environments. If these predictions are accurate, there might be particular patterns of genetic architecture associated with recently diverged behaviors. Specifically, it has been predicted that behaviors linked to population divergence should be underpinned by a few genes of relatively large effect, compared to architectures of intrapopulation behavioral variation, which is considered to be highly polygenic. More mapping studies of behavioral variation between recently diverged populations are needed to continue assessing the generality of these predictions. Here, we used a bulk segregant mapping approach to dissect the genetic architecture of a locomotor trait that has evolved between two populations of the cactophilic fly We created an F8 mapping population of 1,500 individuals from advanced intercross lines and sequenced the 10% of individuals with the highest and lowest levels of locomotor activity. Using three alternative statistical approaches, we found strong evidence for two relatively large-effect QTL that is localized in a region homologous to a region of densely packed behavior loci in , suggesting that clustering of behavior genes may display relatively deep evolutionary conservation. Broadly, our data are most consistent with a polygenic architecture, though with several loci explaining a high proportion of variation in comparison to similar behavioral traits. We further note the presence of several antagonistic QTL linked to locomotion and discuss these results in light of theories regarding behavioral evolution and the effect size and direction of QTL for diverging traits in general.

Citing Articles

Fundamental Patterns of Structural Evolution Revealed by Chromosome-Length Genomes of Cactophilic Drosophila.

Benowitz K, Allan C, Jaworski C, Sanderson M, Diaz F, Chen X Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 39228294 PMC: 11411373. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae191.


A combinatorial strategy to identify various types of QTLs for quantitative traits using extreme phenotype individuals in an F population.

Li P, Li G, Zhang Y, Zuo J, Liu J, Zhang Y Plant Commun. 2022; 3(3):100319.

PMID: 35576159 PMC: 9251438. DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100319.


Novel genetic basis of resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in Helicoverpa zea.

Benowitz K, Allan C, Degain B, Li X, Fabrick J, Tabashnik B Genetics. 2022; 221(1).

PMID: 35234875 PMC: 9071530. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac037.


Contributions of cis- and trans-Regulatory Evolution to Transcriptomic Divergence across Populations in the Drosophila mojavensis Larval Brain.

Benowitz K, Coleman J, Allan C, Matzkin L Genome Biol Evol. 2020; 12(8):1407-1418.

PMID: 32653899 PMC: 7495911. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa145.

References
1.
Gavrilets S, Vose A, Barluenga M, Salzburger W, Meyer A . Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. 1. Cichlids in a crater lake. Mol Ecol. 2007; 16(14):2893-909. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03305.x. View

2.
Etges W, de Oliveira C, Ritchie M, Noor M . Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis: II. Host plants and mating status influence cuticular hydrocarbon QTL expression and G x E interactions. Evolution. 2009; 63(7):1712-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00661.x. View

3.
Rieseberg L, Widmer A, Arntz A, Burke J . The genetic architecture necessary for transgressive segregation is common in both natural and domesticated populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003; 358(1434):1141-7. PMC: 1693210. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1283. View

4.
Schaeffer S, Bhutkar A, McAllister B, Matsuda M, Matzkin L, OGrady P . Polytene chromosomal maps of 11 Drosophila species: the order of genomic scaffolds inferred from genetic and physical maps. Genetics. 2008; 179(3):1601-55. PMC: 2475758. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.086074. View

5.
Schwander T, Libbrecht R, Keller L . Supergenes and complex phenotypes. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(7):R288-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.056. View