» Articles » PMID: 30924060

Does Attribute Amnesia Occur with the Presentation of Complex, Meaningful Stimuli? The Answer Is, "it Depends"

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2019 Mar 30
PMID 30924060
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Attribute amnesia (AA) is a recently reported phenomenon whereby participants are unable to report a salient attribute of a stimulus (e.g., the color or identity of a target letter) on which their attention has just been focused during a prior task. This counterintuitive effect has been repeatedly replicated with various simple stimuli such as digits and letters. The current study sought to explore boundaries of AA by investigating whether the phenomenon persists when participants encounter complex, meaningful stimuli (e.g., pictures) that have been shown to hold an advantage in cognitive processing and memory. In Experiments 1a-d, we examined whether AA was observed with different types of complex stimuli. In Experiments 2a-b and 3a-b, we linked the type of stimuli (simple vs. complex and meaningful stimuli) to the other two potential boundary factors of AA (i.e., repetitiveness of target stimulus and set effects of Einstellung) to see whether there were interactions between stimuli type and these two boundary factors. The results demonstrated that the AA effect was still consistently observed for complex stimuli in a typical AA paradigm wherein participants encountered many trials and the targets were repeated across trials. However, this effect only appeared for simple stimuli, but not for complex stimuli in two special cases: when target stimuli were never repeated through the experiment, or when the surprise test was placed on the first trial of the experiment. These findings have crucial implications in understanding the boundaries of the AA phenomenon.

Citing Articles

Children exhibit superior memory for attended but outdated information compared to adults.

Fu Y, Guo T, Zheng J, He J, Shen M, Chen H Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4058.

PMID: 38744836 PMC: 11094159. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48457-0.


Flexibility Retained: Unimpaired Updating of Expectations in Schizophrenia.

Li J, Chen L, Zhou D, Tang E, Zheng J, Huang X Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38247693 PMC: 10812936. DOI: 10.3390/bs14010041.


And like that, they were gone: A failure to remember recently attended unique faces.

Tam J, Mugno M, ODonnell R, Wyble B Psychon Bull Rev. 2021; 28(6):2027-2034.

PMID: 34240344 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01965-2.


A Metacognitive Perspective of Visual Working Memory With Rich Complex Objects.

Sahar T, Sidi Y, Makovski T Front Psychol. 2020; 11:179.

PMID: 32158411 PMC: 7052332. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00179.

References
1.
Pertzov Y, Dong M, Peich M, Husain M . Forgetting what was where: the fragility of object-location binding. PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e48214. PMC: 3485137. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048214. View

2.
Lamme V . Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Netw. 2004; 17(5-6):861-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.02.005. View

3.
Brady T, Konkle T, Alvarez G, Oliva A . Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(38):14325-9. PMC: 2533687. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803390105. View

4.
Jiang Y, Shupe J, Swallow K, Tan D . Memory for recently accessed visual attributes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016; 42(8):1331-7. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000231. View

5.
Nickerson R . SHORT-TERM MEMORY FOR COMPLEX MEANINGFUL VISUAL CONFIGURATIONS: A DEMONSTRATION OF CAPACITY. Can J Psychol. 1965; 19:155-60. DOI: 10.1037/h0082899. View